↓ Skip to main content

Erythritol production on wheat straw using Trichoderma reesei

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 1,175)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Erythritol production on wheat straw using Trichoderma reesei
Published in
AMB Express, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13568-014-0034-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Birgit Jovanović, Robert L Mach, Astrid R Mach-Aigner

Abstract

We overexpressed the err1 gene in the Trichoderma reesei wild-type and in the cellulase hyperproducing, carbon catabolite derepressed strain Rut-C30 in order to investigate the possibility of producing erythritol with T. reesei. Two different promoters were used for err1 overexpression in both strains, a constitutive (the native pyruvat kinase (pki) promoter) and an inducible one (the native β-xylosidase (bxl1) promoter). The derived recombinant strains were precharacterized by analysis of err1 transcript formation on D-xylose and xylan. Based on this, one strain of each type was chosen for further investigation for erythritol production in shake flasks and in bioreactor experiments. For the latter, we used wheat straw pretreated by an alkaline organosolve process as lignocellulosic substrate. Shake flask experiments on D-xylose showed increased erythritol formation for both, the wild-type and the Rut-C30 overexpression strain compared to their respective parental strain. Bioreactor cultivations on wheat straw did not increase erythritol formation in the wild-type overexpression strain. However, err1 overexpression in Rut-C30 led to a clearly higher erythritol formation on wheat straw.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 22%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 9 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Chemical Engineering 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2014.
All research outputs
#455,512
of 21,343,339 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#8
of 1,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,708
of 205,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,343,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them