↓ Skip to main content

Time Versus Energy in the Averaged Optimal Coplanar Kepler Transfer Towards Circular Orbits

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Applicandae Mathematica, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Time Versus Energy in the Averaged Optimal Coplanar Kepler Transfer Towards Circular Orbits
Published in
Acta Applicandae Mathematica, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10440-014-9948-2
Authors

Bernard Bonnard, Helen C. Henninger, Jana Němcová, Jean-Baptiste Pomet

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,533,573
of 4,506,837 outputs
Outputs from Acta Applicandae Mathematica
#225,109
of 282,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,721
of 106,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Applicandae Mathematica
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,506,837 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 282,364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.