↓ Skip to main content

A Heat and Mass Transfer Model of a Silicon Pilot Furnace

Overview of attention for article published in Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
A Heat and Mass Transfer Model of a Silicon Pilot Furnace
Published in
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11663-017-1052-3
Authors

Benjamin M. Sloman, Colin P. Please, Robert A. Van Gorder, Aasgeir M. Valderhaug, Rolf G. Birkeland, Harald Wegge

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 20%
Professor 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 40%
Mathematics 1 20%
Materials Science 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,227,016
of 11,603,984 outputs
Outputs from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
#415
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,162
of 265,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,603,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them