↓ Skip to main content

P–T conditions of metabasites within regional metapelites in far-eastern Nepal Himalaya and its tectonic meaning

Overview of attention for article published in Swiss Journal of Geosciences, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
P–T conditions of metabasites within regional metapelites in far-eastern Nepal Himalaya and its tectonic meaning
Published in
Swiss Journal of Geosciences, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00015-014-0159-7
Authors

Takeshi Imayama

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Master 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 78%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,877,323
of 24,401,594 outputs
Outputs from Swiss Journal of Geosciences
#122
of 180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,546
of 230,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Swiss Journal of Geosciences
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,401,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.