↓ Skip to main content

Vegetation geo-climatic zonation in the rocky mountains, Northern Utah, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mountain Science, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Vegetation geo-climatic zonation in the rocky mountains, Northern Utah, USA
Published in
Journal of Mountain Science, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11629-013-2793-3
Authors

Antonin Kusbach, Helga Van Miegroet, Janis L. Boettinger, James N. Long

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 56%
Student > Master 3 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 33%
Environmental Science 2 22%
Computer Science 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 11%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2014.
All research outputs
#6,683,566
of 13,028,310 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mountain Science
#45
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,581
of 188,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mountain Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,028,310 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.