↓ Skip to main content

Lack of Diamagnetism and the Little–Parks Effect

Overview of attention for article published in Communications in Mathematical Physics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Lack of Diamagnetism and the Little–Parks Effect
Published in
Communications in Mathematical Physics, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00220-014-2267-7
Authors

Søren Fournais, Mikael Persson Sundqvist

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2014.
All research outputs
#2,961,431
of 4,506,837 outputs
Outputs from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#141,182
of 282,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,166
of 105,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,506,837 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 282,360 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.