| Title |
Task‐specific Fall Prevention Training Is Effective for Warfighters With Transtibial Amputations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-014-3664-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenton R. Kaufman, Marilynn P. Wyatt, Pinata H. Sessoms, Mark D. Grabiner |
| Abstract |
Key factors limiting patients with lower extremity amputations to achieve maximal functional capabilities are falls and fear of falling. A task-specific fall prevention training program has successfully reduced prospectively recorded trip-related falls that occur in the community by the elderly. However, this program has not been tested in amputees. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 309 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 11% |
| Researcher | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 15% |
| Unknown | 90 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 15% |
| Engineering | 35 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 27 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Unknown | 109 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,224,342
of 25,878,862 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,941
of 7,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,578
of 266,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#32
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,878,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.