↓ Skip to main content

The Guiltless Guilty: Trauma-Related Guilt and Psychopathology in Former Ugandan Child Soldiers

Overview of attention for article published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
The Guiltless Guilty: Trauma-Related Guilt and Psychopathology in Former Ugandan Child Soldiers
Published in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10578-014-0470-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fionna Klasen, Sina Reissmann, Catharina Voss, James Okello

Abstract

Child soldiers often experience complex trauma as victims and perpetrators, and feelings of guilt may affect their psychological health. The relationship between the children's traumatic experiences as victims or perpetrators, their perception of themselves as victim or perpetrator, guilt and psychopathology were investigated: of the 330 former child soldiers interviewed, 50.8 % perceived themselves as victims and 19.1 % as perpetrators. On psychopathology measures, scores within the clinical range were 33 % for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), 36.4 % for major depressive disorder (MDD), and 26.1 % for externalizing problems. Low socio-economic status, traumatic experience as perpetrator, and guilt were significant predictors of PTSD. Significant predictors of MDD were low socio-economic status, traumatic experiences as victim, and guilt. A greater number of traumatic experiences as perpetrator and guilt were associated with externalizing problems. The current paper underscores the significance of guilt following traumatic experiences and has implications for the development of clinical interventions for war-affected children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 113 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Researcher 9 8%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 38%
Social Sciences 18 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Arts and Humanities 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,444,323
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#352
of 907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,849
of 227,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.