↓ Skip to main content

A Framework for Characterizing Structural Uncertainty in Large-Eddy Simulation Closures

Overview of attention for article published in Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
A Framework for Characterizing Structural Uncertainty in Large-Eddy Simulation Closures
Published in
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10494-017-9844-8
Authors

Lluís Jofre, Stefan P. Domino, Gianluca Iaccarino

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 39%
Student > Master 4 17%
Unspecified 3 13%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 74%
Unspecified 5 22%
Materials Science 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2017.
All research outputs
#9,838,368
of 12,318,771 outputs
Outputs from Flow, Turbulence and Combustion
#112
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,257
of 269,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Flow, Turbulence and Combustion
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,318,771 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.