Title |
Considerations for Clinicians in the Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema, Recommendations from an Expert Panel: Part 2: Preventive and Therapeutic Options
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.1245/s10434-017-5964-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah A. McLaughlin, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Suzanne Klimberg, Michael Alatriste, Francesco Boccardo, Mark L. Smith, Alicia C. Staley, Paul T. R. Thiruchelvam, Nancy A. Hutchison, Jane Mendez, Fiona MacNeill, Frank Vicini, Stanley G. Rockson, Sheldon M. Feldman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 29% |
Australia | 3 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 36% |
Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
Researcher | 14 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
Other | 21 | 18% |
Unknown | 37 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 13% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Unknown | 45 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 737. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#27,120
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2
of 7,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#504
of 327,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.