RT @arasbozkurt: Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections https://t.co/LBJo8FMQIi
Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections https://t.co/LBJo8FMQIi
@MeLlamoRooster @urbanevol @WileyOpenAccess "Unfair, unsubstantiated, or tardy desk rejections disadvantage academics, and editors and publishers must be held accountable for wasting their time, resources, and patience." https://t.co/YcVDfLxIdV
Guidelines to make desk rejections more fair and ethical: https://t.co/6Axmp2ETCD
Unfair, unsubstantiated, or tardy desk rejections disadvantage academics: https://t.co/6Axmp2ETCD
Interesting article about desk rejections in Science and Engineering Ethics: https://t.co/6Axmp2Wuub https://t.co/AK8MJsgnbc
desk rejectionを妥当で、公平で、倫理的なものにするためのガイドライン。Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections https://t.co/aHuNfmwNga
RT @naomiruffdraft: Papers need "clear identification of a research question...well-designed study...a topic aligned with the mission of th…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Two papers examine why editors desk reject manuscripts https://t.co/3AFyOucfRA and https://t.co/udeguOQ10e The saddest r…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Two papers examine why editors desk reject manuscripts https://t.co/3AFyOucfRA and https://t.co/udeguOQ10e The saddest r…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Two papers examine why editors desk reject manuscripts https://t.co/3AFyOucfRA and https://t.co/udeguOQ10e The saddest r…
Papers need "clear identification of a research question...well-designed study...a topic aligned with the mission of the journal..." Yup. https://t.co/AgSkIiY33H
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Two papers examine why editors desk reject manuscripts https://t.co/3AFyOucfRA and https://t.co/udeguOQ10e The saddest r…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Two papers examine why editors desk reject manuscripts https://t.co/3AFyOucfRA and https://t.co/udeguOQ10e The saddest r…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Two papers examine why editors desk reject manuscripts https://t.co/3AFyOucfRA and https://t.co/udeguOQ10e The saddest r…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Two papers examine why editors desk reject manuscripts https://t.co/3AFyOucfRA and https://t.co/udeguOQ10e The saddest r…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Two papers examine why editors desk reject manuscripts https://t.co/3AFyOucfRA and https://t.co/udeguOQ10e The saddest r…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Two papers examine why editors desk reject manuscripts https://t.co/3AFyOucfRA and https://t.co/udeguOQ10e The saddest r…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Two papers examine why editors desk reject manuscripts https://t.co/3AFyOucfRA and https://t.co/udeguOQ10e The saddest r…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Two papers examine why editors desk reject manuscripts https://t.co/3AFyOucfRA and https://t.co/udeguOQ10e The saddest r…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Two papers examine why editors desk reject manuscripts https://t.co/3AFyOucfRA and https://t.co/udeguOQ10e The saddest r…
Two papers examine why editors desk reject manuscripts https://t.co/3AFyOucfRA and https://t.co/udeguOQ10e The saddest rejections of all 😦