↓ Skip to main content

Variability analysis of Kuroshio intrusion through Luzon Strait using growing hierarchical self-organizing map

Overview of attention for article published in Ocean Dynamics, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Variability analysis of Kuroshio intrusion through Luzon Strait using growing hierarchical self-organizing map
Published in
Ocean Dynamics, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10236-012-0558-0
Authors

I-Fong Tsui, Chau-Ron Wu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Taiwan 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Researcher 3 33%
Student > Master 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 56%
Physics and Astronomy 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2017.
All research outputs
#9,260,860
of 11,574,967 outputs
Outputs from Ocean Dynamics
#143
of 588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,626
of 265,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ocean Dynamics
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,574,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.