@h63072204 For my ideas and scientific critiques, I use proper means eg https://t.co/POVsVMJf7f
@ziggibson @francoimpell @JeroenSwart @Israel_Halperin @_PaulMorgan @Scienceofsport In the meantime, you can read my 2008 paper entitled “Do we really need a central governor to explain brain regulation of exercise performance?” in which I describe all the
And no central governor needed either https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1 7/n
@mikescrooge @Scienceofsport @sweatscience @ziggibson I did manage without the insults, and I did it in scientific journals where Ross had the right to reply and have the last word. See https://t.co/FVix6Jdg32 and https://t.co/JpC2V6jpoH
@fmarino64 Clearly the editors of J Physiol https://t.co/FVix6Jdg32 and of EJAP https://t.co/HPHOIrQsZF were happy with me providing alternative explanations. Sono Pignatari anche loro?
@fmarino64 The problem is more economically solved (in terms of number of entities required) with a model based on psychology/motivation and voluntary regulation of locomotion https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1
On the contrary, in those years, I proposed that there is no central governor https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1 and that perception of effort is not based on central processing of afferent sensory inputs from cardio/pulmonary and peripheral/metabolic sources https:/
@Scienceofsport @ziggibson Funny you said that I did not recognize your inclusion of perceived exertion in the central governor model or however you want to call it. The guy who wrote these letters must be somebody else with my name. See https://t.co/FVix6
@fmarino64 @npdall @Scienceofsport The fact that RPE scales linearly with time to exhaustion can be explained in a way that does not require teleoanticipatory calculations of TTE https://t.co/POVsVMJf7f
@npdall @Scienceofsport You are right, that is a mistake. It should be Crewe et al. 2008. That s the paper I criticised 10years ago https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1 and where the paragraph is copied from.
@npdall @Scienceofsport As I wrote in 2008, the observation that RPE scales with time to exhaustion can be explained in a very different way https://t.co/JpC2V6jpoH
@fmarino64 @GretchenReynold @sweatscience I wrote that CGM was wrong but useful to draw attention on the role of the brain in endurance performance in 2008 https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1 But of course you guys keep saying I never acknowledge your contribution. ba
7. No need for central governors/controllers and teleoanticipatory calculations https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1
In 2009, Tucker renamed the central governor as “central controller”. Big deal. In 2007and 8 I proposed to remove it completely as it is a totally superfluous theoretical construct https://t.co/FVix6Jdg32 https://t.co/POVsVMJf7f https://t.co/khZdS8u1iE
@CerealKillers13 It made that one up too. Indeed, a central governor is not needed to explain endurance performance https://t.co/JpC2V6B0gf
@CerealKillers13 Not really https://t.co/JpC2V6B0gf
@JCesarPL highly cited also to be criticised. e.g. https://t.co/a45tJQIuBW Certainly influential as I mentioned here https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1
@aidencholes @ziggibson @JeroenSwart @LiekeSchiphof @AndyLane27 @NCBI For example me https://t.co/JpC2V6jpoH and Ross https://t.co/XJRvJJb7q8 The end
@ziggibson @JeroenSwart @LiekeSchiphof @AndyLane27 @NCBI Read beginning of this https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1 and of other letters as well
@ziggibson @JeroenSwart @LiekeSchiphof @AndyLane27 @NCBI I meant that I wrote against teleoanticipation of TTE in 2008. It s not a new proposal of mine https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1
@JeroenSwart @LiekeSchiphof @ziggibson @AndyLane27 Same for idea that RPE during TTE tests is produced according to TTE calculation at beginning of exercise https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1
RT @SamueleMarcora: Conscious anticipation of how long one can hold a given pace required only for self paced endurance exercise https://t.…
Conscious anticipation of how long one can hold a given pace required only for self paced endurance exercise https://t.co/RmrYuu9Zkj
@ziggibson @JeroenSwart @fmarino64 No central governor and teleoanticipation required to explain time to exhaustion, also published in 2008 https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1
@fmarino64 @ziggibson @Sale_ExNut of course. Read beginning of my second commentary to CGM https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1 Instead Ross wrote on his website that I ignore his work
@mrdowdeswell I was very happy to keep the discussion scientific and on scientific journals, e.g. https://t.co/FVix6Jdg32 and https://t.co/JpC2V6jpoH
@AndyRenfree I see.Are you using Twitter to engage the students? They may like this https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1 and this https://t.co/tYW6LiQip3
@minzlicht @JeroenSwart @Scienceofsport and no right to reply. Instead I wrote respectful letters to the editor like https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1
@Scienceofsport on "reciprocation" read beginning of second paragraph here (2008): https://t.co/ZecyZL7P2C
@Scienceofsport @Physical_Prep instead, when I wrote letters to the editor: 1) https://t.co/wKWxDSl89m and 2) https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1
@ziggibson @minzlicht I said that many years ago https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1 But in psychology people have just begun to take notice.
RT @SamueleMarcora: @Scienceofsport @JeroenSwart @ziggibson On the acknowledgement issue, read 2nd paragraph here https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1 I…
@Scienceofsport @JeroenSwart @ziggibson On the acknowledgement issue, read 2nd paragraph here https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1 I wrote 8 years ago !
RT @IMLahart: @SamueleMarcora presents his psychobiological model #ERC2015 http://t.co/T9rdWbZWsm http://t.co/H6aNwW26VI http://t.co/VvaSZ1…
@SamueleMarcora presents his psychobiological model #ERC2015 http://t.co/T9rdWbZWsm http://t.co/H6aNwW26VI http://t.co/VvaSZ1tbt1
Clearly not as proposed some yeas ago http://t.co/YlPOuRBltr and http://t.co/veSxYU82tZ
Do we really need a central governor to explain physical fatigue? No says @SamueleMarcora http://t.co/Bp0CbKnJ6D”
Positions on Fatigue during self-paced exercise: @SamueleMarcora Psychobiological model http://t.co/ucXz6VhMN5 and https://t.co/VBVwaXjyw5 1
Positions on Fatigue during self-paced exercise: @SamueleMarcora Psychobiological model http://t.co/ucXz6VhMN5 and https://t.co/VBVwaXjyw5 1
@JeroenSwart @Scienceofsport @IMLahart this has been my point all along http://t.co/wKWxDSl89m and https://t.co/6gn8kltIL1
@ziggibson and I have been saying that for a while http://t.co/veSxYU82tZ
#SPRT3007 Do we really need a central governor to explain brain regulation of exercise performance? http://t.co/PMusQgoRZp
@AndyRenfree I said many of these things six years ago https://t.co/DC7KpNuG7A
@Scienceofsport @ollie_jay13 @CanWarr @fmarino64 4. drawing attention on the important role of the brain in exercise https://t.co/DC7KpNuG7A
@fmarino64 @runnersworld I totally agree with you, and I have said this publicly http://t.co/Mp6pBAkn6T
@Wightness @Scienceofsport The one that should a proper literature review is you guys. http://t.co/W0pd2jgIhZ and https://t.co/2fbT56B7WS