@GreenSpinach7 @meng_nar @dylanbrody @daviss @mgevaart “Excited delirium” is junk science and has been controversial long before Floyd. https://t.co/ielp87889j
@ADocNamedDani @docroland An interesting take... https://t.co/FC1vF0Sy2L
@Acoyvia @fckn_gay That article doesn't say it isn't real. In fact it explicitly says it is real. https://t.co/k8cw8vcNnr
@Moon_Clinic Even your weak claim isn't supported by the article. It doesn't say that. https://t.co/k8cw8vcNnr
@TheRevAl @JoyAnnReid @MeritLaw ...2nd autopsy? "sugestion.... it is a 'diagnosis' that has been used as a convenient way of covering up the use of excessive force by police officers" [3]. https://t.co/9xgzqlJkvz
@Sinixstar @AquarianTiger Because of the typical features mentioned in this link that can be excuses to hold someone down. They don’t fit. It is fishy. https://t.co/vh1ocW2bYi
@Sinixstar @AquarianTiger It also means he’s implying symptoms that are not apparent in any recording or described in the report: https://t.co/vh1ocW2bYi
So many excuses in the way the charges are written - and known loopholes like “excited delirium” -make this a textbook coverup https://t.co/ielp87889j #ChauvinIsAMurderer #RaiseTheDegreee https://t.co/kHBxazSiQV
@dwp4401 https://t.co/ielp87889j I see now that you are a retired EMT and want to offer respect and gratitude. I have some first responders in the family; COVID or not, that’s beautiful work. Excited delirium is just a problematic physiological concept,
Ongoing issues with the diagnosis of excited delirium (The very first line says I’m correct.) https://t.co/j8fH59uFNy
RT @DeliriumPapers: Ongoing issues with the diagnosis of excited delirium. https://t.co/3KLyT42Hpx
RT @DeliriumPapers: Ongoing issues with the diagnosis of excited delirium. https://t.co/3KLyT42Hpx
Ongoing issues with the diagnosis of excited delirium. https://t.co/3KLyT42Hpx
Ongoing issues with the diagnosis of excited delirium https://t.co/N3XnjVhnIh
Ongoing issues with the diagnosis of excited delirium https://t.co/B74i1piVbq