↓ Skip to main content

Uncertainty and the size distribution of rewards from innovation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Evolutionary Economics, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 161)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Uncertainty and the size distribution of rewards from innovation
Published in
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, January 2000
DOI 10.1007/s001910050011
Authors

F. M. Scherer, Dietmar Harhoff, Jörg Kukies

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 3 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 53 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 42%
Professor 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 19 32%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 28%
Social Sciences 8 13%
Unspecified 7 12%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Other 6 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2009.
All research outputs
#3,849,391
of 13,050,552 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#49
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,543
of 265,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,050,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.