| Title |
StanXY: standard curve app for Android
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Phone Apps and Mobile Devices, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41070-015-0003-0 |
| Authors |
Ian-Hartono Budianto, Chun-Foong Wong, Phi-Vu Nguyen, Samuel Ken-En Gan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 33% |
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 33% |
| Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,536,586
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Phone Apps and Mobile Devices
#17
of 34 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,811
of 391,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Phone Apps and Mobile Devices
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them