| Title |
A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dagmar Haase, Neele Larondelle, Erik Andersson, Martina Artmann, Sara Borgström, Jürgen Breuste, Erik Gomez-Baggethun, Åsa Gren, Zoé Hamstead, Rieke Hansen, Nadja Kabisch, Peleg Kremer, Johannes Langemeyer, Emily Lorance Rall, Timon McPhearson, Stephan Pauleit, Salman Qureshi, Nina Schwarz, Annette Voigt, Daniel Wurster, Thomas Elmqvist |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 3 | 30% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,455 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 7 | <1% |
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1416 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 274 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 245 | 17% |
| Researcher | 219 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 109 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 77 | 5% |
| Other | 233 | 16% |
| Unknown | 298 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 531 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 144 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 76 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 66 | 5% |
| Engineering | 63 | 4% |
| Other | 167 | 11% |
| Unknown | 408 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,553,971
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#263
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,965
of 240,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.