RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
We knew is 2005 that chloroquine was an effective treatment for SARS CoV. And yet when COVID arrived (SARS CoV-2) where was Project Warp Speed to distribute this as quickly as possible to high-risk demographics?
How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005, it was known to be an effective treatment for SARS CoV. @MRobertsQLD @SenatorRennick @cafelockedout @chrismartenson @rustyrockets
@ImBeingCandid @SheilaGunnReid No. Covid 19 shots were produced fast because it was a lab leak from wuhun China. Then they downloaded the recipe for us to use. They didn’t use that recipe. So why would China give us a recipe to something they won’t use??
@CoolZed68 @es_gaia @Poulin2012 Tiens! toi aussi va au source fossoyeur de bonne nouvelle. En 2005 Fauci annonçait ds les médias que ses chercheurs avaient enfin trouvé l'antidote contre tous les coronas virus, devine quoi, l'HCQ. Sors ton traducteur et me
@Acermendax Comme crétin tu es difficile à battre. Je te fait cadeau d'une adresse du NIH de Fauci exposant une étude spectaculaire sur HCQ et ce datant de 2005. Cette étude démontrait que c'était un médoc prophylactique et thérapeutique de tous les corona
RT @abikhalil_t: A study from 2005 shows that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” https…
@BelliqueuseP @PascalPraud @EspritReflexion @PascalPraud @ELevyCauseur @ivanrioufol Pour que vous compreniez une fois pour toute qu'il y a eu préméditation dans le génocide a venir du Peuple Français s'il ne reçoit pas d'antidote rapidement..le groupe tém
@Poulin2012 au Ducon Lajoie @Acermendax, le Pr Raoult avait raison ...et l'a prouvé dans la prise en charge précoce des cas Covid à l'IHU de Marseille...le plus faible taux de mortalité en France au plus fort de la crise en 2020... 2005 https://t.co/xqvGI2
@DrBMcDH @DrJBhattacharya Known since 2005. https://t.co/Q0hkEEuSAY
RT @covidgoesawayw1: @RpsAgainstTrump Because he knew about the cure to COVId in 2005 and lied that it didn’t work https://t.co/zZ2AsmnLTR
@ThaCleanerNL @JudithDubero Goh in 2005 wisten ze al dat chloroquine werkt tegen sars-cov-1 https://t.co/lBNhT4GYXI
Cc @drakchaurasia @DarrellMello @Dharmen46587056
@ClaireJardin1 comme pour l'hydroxychloroquine...puissant inhibiteur des SARS-Cov...Salomon -Buzyn - Véran - Braun et consors une bande de criminels génocidaires 2005 https://t.co/xqvGI2zmrQ
RT @abikhalil_t: A study from 2005 shows that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” https…
RT @abikhalil_t: A study from 2005 shows that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” https…
RT @abikhalil_t: A study from 2005 shows that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” https…
RT @abikhalil_t: A study from 2005 shows that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” https…
RT @abikhalil_t: A study from 2005 shows that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” https…
@StatChrisCotton @verity_france @annaigiannac @mussomichele13 nous avoir privé de ces traitements précoces....cela s'appelle de la préméditation.... https://t.co/xqvGI2zmrQ
RT @covidgoesawayw1: @RpsAgainstTrump Because he knew about the cure to COVId in 2005 and lied that it didn’t work https://t.co/zZ2AsmnLTR
@deargolachicken @lucioaraujo1956 @profpaulamarisa Sim, esse também não é confiavel? Pesquise um pouco e vai achar matérias alegando até a próproa FTX financiando jornais para difamar os estudos feitos sobre cloroquina e invermectina. https://t.co/hfBF9h
@runningsisyphus @Oilfield_Rando If safe, effective treatments existed, or were available to try, it would be imperative to deplatformed advocates and do a full-court press in social media to deprecate them. https://t.co/Q0hkEEuSAY
Read this fascinating thread. I’d add (3)—After reading Pradhan’s paper (1/31/20) and its description of the spike protein and its HIV similar insertions, how many people would’ve voluntarily chosen to take mRNA injections that made their bodies produce tr
@Eric_Schmitt Very important question : Why did your team from NIH in 2005 was recommending #HydroxyChloroquine both as a cure and a vaccine against SARS and you did everything you could to forbid it in 2020 https://t.co/Yx8fDbl1ZD https://t.co/XyROyhRtO
RT @carl_jurassic: They knew
@RatioScientiae @XavierNathan12 And yet here is the actual journal on the NIH site - from 2005🤔 https://t.co/3CCb0xUx83
Hmm.. "millions died.." It seems like some of the involved people don't care at all. Or in fact do care, and applaud it: there have been "endless" possibilities to stop the madness, but those who knew and could, didn't. Likely matters happened in WWII.
RT @carl_jurassic: They knew
They literally were willing to murder people in order to serve the jab is our only hope mantra.
RT @carl_jurassic: They knew
They knew