RT @inky_mark: Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/yofbE3YJRa
@Overfakenews @brixwe @tezzig1961 Receipt for article: https://t.co/Y3mfH1Wxh0
RT @inky_mark: Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/yofbE3YJRa
RT @inky_mark: Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/yofbE3YJRa
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/yofbE3YJRa
RT @Wontevertweet27: @inky_mark From 2005..... https://t.co/ocwgTrawfR
RT @Wontevertweet27: @inky_mark From 2005..... https://t.co/ocwgTrawfR
RT @Wontevertweet27: @inky_mark From 2005..... https://t.co/ocwgTrawfR
RT @Wontevertweet27: @inky_mark From 2005..... https://t.co/ocwgTrawfR
@JokeBruis38 @mkeulemans @PvanHouwelingen https://t.co/lBNhT4HwNg vreemd hè dat in 2005 chloroquine wel hielp bij sars-cov-1 maar nu ineens niet?
@inky_mark From 2005..... https://t.co/ocwgTrawfR
@washingtonpost @elonmusk Weren't we told by them all that Chloroquine? CLASSIC EXAMPLE of WHY WE do our own research, and don't "follow the science" spiel. Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread Martin J Vincent et al.
@d34thk4mp1 @pjbimage @thevivafrei @kdlaw Remember when they were saying Chloroquine does nothing? Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread Published: 22 August 2005 https://t.co/67ZcrYcEeL
@AaronFelsheim @brixwe @LuLFo9 Pretty simple google search…. Amazing what folks can learn if they do their own research.. https://t.co/kF7TW90byh
@RobyFranois2 @SaebaDavid @DearHeader @Acermendax @xazalbert @andrebercoff Tenez, pour la route, https://t.co/jQrtkdyrAs (Anthony Fauci, 2005)
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread # Martin J Vincent et al. Virol J. 2005. #COVID19 https://t.co/oUjwAURyul
@Abiud_Amaro @PnutButta3 @hugh_mankind The 1st one did so with no vaccines. And guess what Fauci's NIH saw as an effective treatment https://t.co/REyL04pWpu
RT @SteredL: @YvesPDB @france_soir 2005 https://t.co/xqvGI2zUho 2017 Toujours en vente libre https://t.co/IDgaC78LLT avec préméditation Bu…
@ckp4111 They sure as heck won't seek FACTS. So Fraudci and big pharma keep pushing 💀 jab. Remember when we all told THIS wouldn't work. What's that year...2005? Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread Published: 22 Aug
RT @WrongDarkAlley: @BittBurger @RubinReport @elonmusk Like hydroxychloroquine? Might want to read this from 2005. https://t.co/CIubKDzHMZ
RT @caron_johanne: @marseille_jeff @LeachatG Le seul produit qui fait cela "in vitro" c'est l'HCQ voir cette étude du NIH de Fauci en 2005.…
@OdouThomas @EbubuSecours @Vivi29355253 @Acermendax @MartinBlachier @idrissaberkane Ivermectine https://t.co/sBQib86WXl https://t.co/PXZyQYB5iC https://t.co/DOeVfbvX8D Hydroxychloroquine https://t.co/43L7CgP83w https://t.co/qQ4SJfLTeT Vitamine D https
RT @caron_johanne: @marseille_jeff @LeachatG Le seul produit qui fait cela "in vitro" c'est l'HCQ voir cette étude du NIH de Fauci en 2005.…
@YvesPDB @france_soir 2005 https://t.co/xqvGI2zUho 2017 Toujours en vente libre https://t.co/IDgaC78LLT avec préméditation Buzin-Salomon la classe substance vénéneuse sur avis le 12/11/2019, 3 semaines après la répétition de Davos le 18/10/2019.. https:/
@pittbull_grrr @PascalPraud avoir interdit l'accès aux soins précoces avec préméditation le 12/11/2019 alors que 2005 : https://t.co/Oo3ruMs011 et que 2017 vente libre : https://t.co/IDgaC7pONT Cela vaudra la potence pour beaucoup d'entre eux...
@JesseKellyDC . #putthatinyourpipe @JesseKellyDC @SteveDeaceShow @scrowder @SaraGonzalesTX @JeffyJFR Right after Trump mentioned HCQ and their response to it. Note the date!!! https://t.co/JH5OFID7F2
@ginged78 @NemesisN2022 @drsimonegold At a time when remdesovir and paxlovid werent available, what did you expect doctors 2 do? The right 2 try is an ind. choice. When a Dr wants to try something that is available, who are you to interfere if you’re neit
RT @SteredL: @zoomabus A votre avis? 2005 https://t.co/xqvGI2zUho Substance vénéneuse sur avis du 12/11/2019, 3 semaines après la répétit…
@marseille_jeff @LeachatG Le seul produit qui fait cela "in vitro" c'est l'HCQ voir cette étude du NIH de Fauci en 2005. L'année ou ils ont enfin découvert l'antidote de tous les coronas virus qui permettait enfin de lancer la pandémie finale ultime. https
RT @SteredL: @zoomabus A votre avis? 2005 https://t.co/xqvGI2zUho Substance vénéneuse sur avis du 12/11/2019, 3 semaines après la répétit…
@zoomabus A votre avis? 2005 https://t.co/xqvGI2zUho Substance vénéneuse sur avis du 12/11/2019, 3 semaines après la répétition générale de Davos à New York le 18/10/2019 https://t.co/X0hoZEN5z8 https://t.co/h6dFoXupEK
@murielleV2017 @JuliaCerisi ils vont aller en prison et peut être la potence pour certains pour génocide avec préméditation ...le Professeur Raoult avait raison ...2005 https://t.co/xqvGI2zUho
RT @SteredL: @MichaelVllt @JuliaCerisi @chris_perronne @PascalPraud @raoult_didier et effectivement le Pr Raoult avait raison l'hydroxychl…
@tedcruz The 2005 NIH study linked below finds HCQ is a Corona Virus Wonder Drug! https://t.co/1klEzGHLmV https://t.co/2OgLcvujz8
@NicolasPichot6 Prémédité comme le classement de l'hydroxychloroquine comme substance vénéneuse sur avis du 12/11/2019 alors que https://t.co/xqvGI2zmrQ
@coachdanalucas @Lizmadhatter864 @TomHarpointner @MGator9 @AdriePritchett @DonotInnovate @akheriaty https://t.co/wEgKVBvSyB Yes, HCQ had an NIH paper on its effectiveness. And yet somehow they stopped people from using it because they were afraid there wo
@MichaelVllt @JuliaCerisi @chris_perronne @PascalPraud @raoult_didier et effectivement le Pr Raoult avait raison l'hydroxychloroquine est un puissant inhibiteur du SarsCov., C'est bien pour cela que Buzin Salomon avec préméditation ont classé l'hydroxychl
@Noellenarwhal @Adelheid_AzPf @donkitrk99 @LonghairCanuck @ESTINDAL @ProbablyNotYes Now for some more interesting things. A study from 2005 showing strong results that HCQ was effective against sars cov corona type viruses, leading one to believe why the i
@JakeOakley_ @CariKelemen @RealJamesWoods I listened to doctors. One in particular is a cardiologist of 30 years. Peer reviewed and published over 600 times. Not a single malpractice suit. You act like science isn't bought regularly. How many retractions
@BreezerGalway @AlBowers1 @moshbourne @TakethatCt @KITTYKAT99 @SwaledaleMutton @harry_temp @judysimpson222 @DavidPNoble63 @DrSusanOliver1 @R @sailorrooscout @SabinehazanMD The only one lying is you. Hydroxychloroquine was a known treatment for SARS Covid i
@Chesschick01 Late March of 2019, read a study from 2005 showing that Chloriquine stopped sars1 in its tracks if administered early once symptoms occurred. Sars 1 & 2 are 80% of the same virus. There's much more, but this was my aha moment! https://t.
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread | Virology Journal | Full Text https://t.co/WM9pidLAh5
@Fisherlady111 very true..... they knew it all along.....from 2005... https://t.co/1Cx5DtHOAN
@zoomabus C'était 3 semaines avant que Buzin- Salomon sur avis le 12/11/2019 décide de classer l'hydroxychloroquine comme substance vénénéseuse , alors qu'il est un puissant inhibiteur du SarsCov... https://t.co/xqvGI2zUho et https://t.co/X0hoZEN5z8
RT @caron_johanne: @AlexisPhilo @Battersea7801 Pour le complotisme qui avait sa raison d'être, voici la preuve brevetée du complot derrière…
RT @nostinkinroads: https://t.co/eSF2oyPyra cc: @jsolomonReports
RT @nostinkinroads: https://t.co/eSF2oyPyra cc: @jsolomonReports
@JRJHealey Poor silly hypocritical IRONIC 6%ers, yakking dumbassery for their incompetence, laziness, incomprehension . 🤭😂🤣😂 Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread Published: 22 August 2005 https://t.co/67ZcrYc6pd
https://t.co/eSF2oyPyra cc: @jsolomonReports
@AlexisPhilo @Battersea7801 Pour le complotisme qui avait sa raison d'être, voici la preuve brevetée du complot derrière la fabrication d'une arme biologique de destruction massive. Eux ils ont l'HCQ. https://t.co/xn6RtBJfBm https://t.co/UpQy7ltwWb
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread | Virology Journal | Full Text https://t.co/XFusJz4aug
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @abikhalil_t: A study from 2005 shows that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” https…
@LCP @CarolineYADAN Les soins préventifs ...autre alternative aux poisons injectés (génocide en devenir) - METABIOTA, Natan Wolfe, père de l’hydroxyde de graphène dans les vaccins dont le cycle(vie) est de 8 ans)...@raoult_didier @PrJoyeux 2005... https:/
RT @abikhalil_t: A study from 2005 shows that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” https…
You certainly have to be totally corrupt to deny really ill people a chance of healing.
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @SteredL: @StatChrisCotton @verity_france @annaigiannac @mussomichele13 nous avoir privé de ces traitements précoces....cela s'appelle d…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @caron_johanne: @Acermendax Comme crétin tu es difficile à battre. Je te fait cadeau d'une adresse du NIH de Fauci exposant une étude sp…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…
RT @dragonfishy: How corrupt ( and brain dead) do you need to be to deny chloroquine to SARS coronavirus sufferers. Back as far as 2005,…