RT @OldSaltCityAce: @kksheld @EpochTV The 2005 NIH study linked below finds HCQ is a Corona Virus Wonder Drug! https://t.co/1klEzGHdxn Ye…
@laralogan They knew in 2005 that H C Q worked as well. Even Chloroquine worked. https://t.co/rPcfSh40wM
RT @MitchNicholsJr: @drdrew From 2005 they knew chloroquine worked. https://t.co/PjXtZ8Xut4
@drdrew From 2005 they knew chloroquine worked. https://t.co/PjXtZ8Xut4
@its_the_Dr #CovidFRAUD Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19 https://t.co/9PHciighaa Chloroquine has been known since 2005(!) to combat coronavirus https://t.co/exp7lFonZH 2005 Aug 22 “chloroquine has stro
RT @DrLylePLysol: Fauci & CDC knew as of August 22, 2005 that HCQ was cure/vaccine for viruses like C19 / SARS family of coronaviruses. Thi…
RT @OldSaltCityAce: @kksheld @EpochTV The 2005 NIH study linked below finds HCQ is a Corona Virus Wonder Drug! https://t.co/1klEzGHdxn Ye…
RT @OldSaltCityAce: @its_the_Dr @JGalt09 The 2005 NIH study linked below finds HCQ is a Corona Virus Wonder Drug! https://t.co/1klEzGHdxn…
@Liana53160 Guess where #FauciFraud worked? NIH What did the NIH know? Hydroxychloroquine effective,consistently so when provided early https://t.co/9PHciighaa Chloroquine since 2005(!)combat coronavirus https://t.co/exp7lFonZH 2005Aug“chloroquine has s
@its_the_Dr @JGalt09 The 2005 NIH study linked below finds HCQ is a Corona Virus Wonder Drug! https://t.co/1klEzGHdxn https://t.co/1lQVSU16dq
@kksheld @EpochTV The 2005 NIH study linked below finds HCQ is a Corona Virus Wonder Drug! https://t.co/1klEzGHdxn Yet, Fauci in 2020 said it was worthless. https://t.co/LFInn8bx82
@jeffrey_wick Timestamp: https://t.co/LwCtzEWRlY Related Papers: https://t.co/ivibvn1VeL https://t.co/Pb5dU4O0fl https://t.co/0lm3LnSimx
RT @DrLylePLysol: Fauci & CDC knew as of August 22, 2005 that HCQ was cure/vaccine for viruses like C19 / SARS family of coronaviruses. Thi…
@AntiWokeBritain Or hydroxychloroquine when they knew chloroquine previously had great success against SARS-COV (2003). https://t.co/Kl9Sq9nQRU
RT @DrLylePLysol: Fauci & CDC knew as of August 22, 2005 that HCQ was cure/vaccine for viruses like C19 / SARS family of coronaviruses. Thi…
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread UMMM... "We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells..." The governments have denied us this treatment https://t.co/nZR
RT @DrLylePLysol: Fauci & CDC knew as of August 22, 2005 that HCQ was cure/vaccine for viruses like C19 / SARS family of coronaviruses. Thi…
RT @DrLylePLysol: Fauci & CDC knew as of August 22, 2005 that HCQ was cure/vaccine for viruses like C19 / SARS family of coronaviruses. Thi…
RT @DrLylePLysol: Fauci & CDC knew as of August 22, 2005 that HCQ was cure/vaccine for viruses like C19 / SARS family of coronaviruses. Thi…
RT @DrLylePLysol: Fauci & CDC knew as of August 22, 2005 that HCQ was cure/vaccine for viruses like C19 / SARS family of coronaviruses. Thi…
RT @DrLylePLysol: Fauci & CDC knew as of August 22, 2005 that HCQ was cure/vaccine for viruses like C19 / SARS family of coronaviruses. Thi…
@DrEvil2003 Really? Fauci's NIH published this in 2005. I am also a healthcare professional for over 25 yrs and work in a major metropolitan hospital. The critical care doc said re IVM, " We can't use it. They're watching us".Our infection control doc used
17 years ago we knew that chloroquine was an effective inhibitor of the SARS corona virus. COVID19 is a SARS corona virus. Here’s proof: https://t.co/Bjt8us3HKx
RT @DrLylePLysol: Fauci & CDC knew as of August 22, 2005 that HCQ was cure/vaccine for viruses like C19 / SARS family of coronaviruses. Thi…
RT @DrLylePLysol: Fauci & CDC knew as of August 22, 2005 that HCQ was cure/vaccine for viruses like C19 / SARS family of coronaviruses. Thi…
RT @DrLylePLysol: Fauci & CDC knew as of August 22, 2005 that HCQ was cure/vaccine for viruses like C19 / SARS family of coronaviruses. Thi…
RT @DrLylePLysol: Fauci & CDC knew as of August 22, 2005 that HCQ was cure/vaccine for viruses like C19 / SARS family of coronaviruses. Thi…
RT @DrLylePLysol: Fauci & CDC knew as of August 22, 2005 that HCQ was cure/vaccine for viruses like C19 / SARS family of coronaviruses. Thi…
RT @DrLylePLysol: Fauci & CDC knew as of August 22, 2005 that HCQ was cure/vaccine for viruses like C19 / SARS family of coronaviruses. Thi…
Fauci & CDC knew as of August 22, 2005 that HCQ was cure/vaccine for viruses like C19 / SARS family of coronaviruses. This lifesaving info was knowingly withheld from the world in 2020 & 2021. Cc: @shreshonur Link: https://t.co/5M2itV7mss https://t
@kurteichenwald Sure thing, Eichenwald. https://t.co/G3hZ4iliDO
@FakeNickGriff @davidmweissman @elonmusk Ain't it funny how no "respectable" person should listen to me and yet you're here begging for my attention. Here since we both know you're incapable of finding information for yourself https://t.co/IdFxeeg3Kt
@Boris__42 Virology Journal 2005 site officiel des NIH de Fauci un article indiquant que la chloroquine est un inhibiteur efficace du coronavirus. "We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells"
@erdocAA @MichaelPSenger What was the treatment protocol for patients that could not breath ? In 2005, it was known that SARS-Cov which is 70% of the SARS-Cov-2, was successfully treated with Chloroquine. 👇 https://t.co/M2xloedWqa
@web_shite @RWMaloneMD It wasn't "possibly" HCQ, it was also HCQ. 2005 studies involving CQ and the Sars-CoV virus showed that CQ was a very promising anti-viral for that virus, which is, obviously, a sars virus. Yet, HCQ was/is as demonized as ivermecti
NIH knew that chloroquine was a valid treatment for Covid/SARS since 2005. #Fauci #BigLie https://t.co/bB4mcB6oMn
RT @PhillyPharmaBoy: @knight2_day @johnrackham82 Neither Fauci nor NIH published work showing chloroquine inhibited SARS replication in vit…
@soclib_fiscnsrv @VeronicaGoostre From 2005 NIH https://t.co/zyaj9PE0bA
@krassenstein Remember that time when Fauci said Chloroquine/HCQ was the "Cure" for SARS Coronavirus in his Virolgogy Journal in 2005? Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread and wrote about it in https://t.co/0c2ZUeGJ5
The TRUTH will set us free🇺🇸
@LeMarraine @france_soir @GregoryPamart @olivier_soulier @RogezVeronique Il y a un traitement précoce avec une efficacité proche de 100% qui a été publié le 5 août 2005. Un remède/vaccin contre les coronavirus C19 / SRAS. Cette information vitale a été sci
@MarioNawfal QUESTION. For Liza or Joanna. Why did they ignore or deny evidence that #HCQ worked? They knew it worked. It’s was and stil is hosted on the NIH website. Fauci knew HCQ was both a preventative and a cure. Read it here. It’s from 2005. https
RT @marlamans: @hugh_mankind @joshg99 This 2005 paper, five of whose authors were CDC employees, reported that chloroquine had strong antiv…
RT @iamthebluestorm: Although this was published (public) in 2005, I was not able to share it in 2020 or 2021. Chloroquine is a potent inhi…
RT @Ramon4lan: Olha o que eu achei na internet..... Um artigo publicado em 2005 sobre cloroquina x sars cov. Lembrando que o covid-19 adv…
Article published in 2005: Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread (SARS-CoV not SARS-CoV-2) https://t.co/XMPFYxgpdx
@TraderStf @RisYves Bizarre, Fr2 n'a pas cherché les faussaires de l'étude du lancet ? Des centaines d'études ont été faites sur lhydroxychloroquine. On sait c'que t'es, 🖕 https://t.co/RvU3JAcizS
@DaleEnright2 @PierreKory Chloroquine known since 2005. https://t.co/Q0hkEEuSAY
If you are takng ANY "vaccine"at this juncture,you are willingly participating in the accelerated demise of your immune system. CHEAP readily available preventions, incl your own immune system hav been ignored by these Nazis gripping our Public Health Sys
@RichwoodsAus @MattHoyOfficial They didn’t want doctors to use Ivermectin and Hydrochloriquin because it works, and it’s cheap. https://t.co/fDCGwljgwZ
Published in 2005. Covid is a SARs coronovirus. This paper was published with the results of a study on the effectiveness of treating SARs with chloroquin. Headline: Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread. https://t.c
Not puzzling They probably have HCQ avail over the counter Cloraquine (pre cursor) was proven in 2005 by Fraudci in a study he oversaw. Read for yourself As @elonmusk stated his pronouns are "Prosecute Fauci" He murdered millions Crimes against humanity h
RT @hkakeya: HCQが新型コロナに効くというのはデマと言っていた人に聞きます。下記論文等、SARSにクロロキンが効くという先行研究があるのは知っていましたか? https://t.co/b979Smh0io ① 知らなかった ② 知っていたが米当局が効果を否定したの…
@fynn_fan @prima__facie They knew this in 2005. https://t.co/nrZUTS0cYG
RT @hkakeya: HCQが新型コロナに効くというのはデマと言っていた人に聞きます。下記論文等、SARSにクロロキンが効くという先行研究があるのは知っていましたか? https://t.co/b979Smh0io ① 知らなかった ② 知っていたが米当局が効果を否定したの…
@rebelpuss @Bees3Three He's a #ScienceDenier https://t.co/9PHciighaa "Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID" Chloroquine known since 2005(!) to combat coronavirus https://t.co/exp7lFonZH 2005 Aug 22 “chloroqu
@jimgill169 @benshapiro @RWMaloneMD It would have been if the MSM didn't lie and vilify HCQ when Trump mentioned it. https://t.co/gqQ8z0DW5X
RT @AnaPaAninha: Sobre a cloroquina: "Ainda em fase de testes, temos que analisar antes de usar." Eis que o ano é 2005, e... Segue link…
RT @hkakeya: HCQが新型コロナに効くというのはデマと言っていた人に聞きます。下記論文等、SARSにクロロキンが効くという先行研究があるのは知っていましたか? https://t.co/b979Smh0io ① 知らなかった ② 知っていたが米当局が効果を否定したの…
RT @hkakeya: HCQが新型コロナに効くというのはデマと言っていた人に聞きます。下記論文等、SARSにクロロキンが効くという先行研究があるのは知っていましたか? https://t.co/b979Smh0io ① 知らなかった ② 知っていたが米当局が効果を否定したの…
RT @hkakeya: HCQが新型コロナに効くというのはデマと言っていた人に聞きます。下記論文等、SARSにクロロキンが効くという先行研究があるのは知っていましたか? https://t.co/b979Smh0io ① 知らなかった ② 知っていたが米当局が効果を否定したの…
RT @hkakeya: HCQが新型コロナに効くというのはデマと言っていた人に聞きます。下記論文等、SARSにクロロキンが効くという先行研究があるのは知っていましたか? https://t.co/b979Smh0io ① 知らなかった ② 知っていたが米当局が効果を否定したの…
RT @hkakeya: HCQが新型コロナに効くというのはデマと言っていた人に聞きます。下記論文等、SARSにクロロキンが効くという先行研究があるのは知っていましたか? https://t.co/b979Smh0io ① 知らなかった ② 知っていたが米当局が効果を否定したの…
RT @hkakeya: HCQが新型コロナに効くというのはデマと言っていた人に聞きます。下記論文等、SARSにクロロキンが効くという先行研究があるのは知っていましたか? https://t.co/b979Smh0io ① 知らなかった ② 知っていたが米当局が効果を否定したの…
RT @hkakeya: HCQが新型コロナに効くというのはデマと言っていた人に聞きます。下記論文等、SARSにクロロキンが効くという先行研究があるのは知っていましたか? https://t.co/b979Smh0io ① 知らなかった ② 知っていたが米当局が効果を否定したの…
RT @hkakeya: HCQが新型コロナに効くというのはデマと言っていた人に聞きます。下記論文等、SARSにクロロキンが効くという先行研究があるのは知っていましたか? https://t.co/b979Smh0io ① 知らなかった ② 知っていたが米当局が効果を否定したの…
HCQが新型コロナに効くというのはデマと言っていた人に聞きます。下記論文等、SARSにクロロキンが効くという先行研究があるのは知っていましたか? https://t.co/b979Smh0io ① 知らなかった ② 知っていたが米当局が効果を否定したので追随した ③ 知っていたがトランプが効くと言ったので逆張りした
@Nightcatangel @PureBlood33 @Ukraine66251776 Here is the link https://t.co/zyaj9PV3dA
@BrentHarringt22 @Mooby_Doo @PureBlood33 And this one from 2005 https://t.co/zyaj9PV3dA
@PeterNBarker @PureBlood33 @EarthGirl20 2 things for you, first one from 2005 Second from Jan 22 https://t.co/WpLTDTLEIS https://t.co/Hz6UuDKyCe
RT @marlamans: @hugh_mankind @joshg99 This 2005 paper, five of whose authors were CDC employees, reported that chloroquine had strong antiv…
@kacdnp91 We knew about effective treatments in early 2020. NIH knew in 2005. Everything since has been Deep State evil shit. https://t.co/optPwYoR4A
@pwolfley @RenzTom @KimDotcom @SenTedCruz @RandPaul @RonJohnsonWI @AGHuff @elonmusk HCQ and ivermectin. The report @RenzTom is referencing mentions both. The NIH has know about Chloroquine since 2005. https://t.co/optPwYGsta
2005;Virology journal of NIH-CHLOQUINE IS A POTENT Inhibitor of corona... https://t.co/k2FGxFkcnn
@Louise81637779 @ringothe5th @JulieRoland4 @unbridledmd HCQ’s sister worked great for SARS 1.0: https://t.co/2BFFQZ4kd4
RT @BobPatt98372845: @unbridledmd I agree! Did you also see the article from 2005 FROM the CDC tauting HCQ? https://t.co/HhDmCNFCci
@unbridledmd I agree! Did you also see the article from 2005 FROM the CDC tauting HCQ? https://t.co/HhDmCNFCci
@PhillyPharmaBoy @tazalot1981 @ronportnoir @Conchir3 @SimonWattTweets Not sure about ivermectin, but chloroquin certainly studied by Fauci's NIH https://t.co/cgEvsq7NGV
@dr_l_alexandre @raoult_didier Un remède charlatanesque ? On se demande qui est le charlatan ? National Library of medicine: https://t.co/KrSRxMreTe
RT @Ramon4lan: Olha o que eu achei na internet..... Um artigo publicado em 2005 sobre cloroquina x sars cov. Lembrando que o covid-19 adv…
Interesting article from 2005- They knew! https://t.co/HhDmCNFCci