RT @NTanzerin: @EltontoNick @SpartaJustice Heres a study from 2005 showing that Chloroquins like HCQ are potent viral inhibitors for corona…
@KLVeritas @bobscartoons . #putthatinyourpipe @JesseKellyDC @SteveDeaceShow @SaraGonzalesTX @JeffyJFR When they attacked Hydroxychloroquine and saw this, note the date of the study!!! https://t.co/JH5OFIlwNu
@m_zenonus @Olivierfente @gouvernementFR Il y a aussi cette étude, donc l'intention volontaire de ne pas SOIGNER est claire. https://t.co/pI1aVHAvba
@g8ilz @PeterSweden7 You are wrong about ivermectin. It is a proven anti viral and there are many peer reviewed papers about its efficacy. As is also hydroxychoroquin. Look at the date of this paper. Things that make you go hmmm 🤔 https://t.co/4kKnXaElhc
RT @BellaLu49818813: @porterguy1 On the pharma blogs we started discussing this paper in very early March. By mid-March, they hadn't even…
20/ And it looks as if #Fauci knew of all that https://t.co/3kDqrxaogf (link to the 2005 article is here: https://t.co/Lc2VBlw8PC)
@OfficialKamahl Then you have the suppression of antivirals. Even "the Lancet" published (later redacted) hit pieces against HCQ and CDC made mockery of IVM despite positive research and results from use. I will only add a few examples here as there is a
Chloroquine an effective prophylactic and therapeutic against SARS https://t.co/WZSXK3tbXG
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
He KNEW chloroquine worked against sars coronavirus https://t.co/vRG1WaVy2Z
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.co/J6iDZUs9tV
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
https://t.co/OeNPcNiWv8 Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread Martin J Vincent et al. Virol J. 2005 #SARS #NIH #Coronavirus https://t.co/PI5flJA1l9
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox And ... Fauci KNEW since at least 2005 that treatment already exists: https://t.co/eoTJLMgMvT https://t.c…
RT @lightenupnow: Hydroxychloroquine proven effective against coronavirus by Dr. Fauci.
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
@aginnt Fauci is best source for misinformation about covidvaccines. https://t.co/OWEpHsR3MQ
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
@porterguy1 On the pharma blogs we started discussing this paper in very early March. By mid-March, they hadn't even cancelled the St. Patrick's Day Parade because of Covid but you could not get a script filled for HCQ. https://t.co/6TKyrsalV9
@MonsieurDworkin @Guy_Fawkes_News @JulienPain @Luc__Brisson Raoult et d'autres disent que l'HCQ couplé à l'azithromycine donné au bon moment fait considérablement baisser la charge virale. D'ailleurs à l'époque du sars-cov1, on utilisait la chloroquine : h
@VigilantFox @KanekoaTheGreat Fauci knew back in 2005 that HCQ was effective to BOTH inhibit AND treat Sars-coronavirus. The NIH posted a journal about it https://t.co/vRG1WaW5Sx
Hydroxychloroquine proven effective against coronavirus by Dr. Fauci.
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
@AlanScis @thevivafrei @BillGates You mean like this? https://t.co/HzbagJSCTN
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @skeptikosMMXX: @DrGustavolima Vc é livre p/ achar e afirmar o q vc não sabe. Meta-análise de estudos populacionais padrão-ouro: https:/…
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @abikhalil_t: A study from 2005 shows that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” https…
@HoneyBearNerdz @VigilantFox Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/1YrHxYGgTf
@DrGustavolima Vc é livre p/ achar e afirmar o q vc não sabe. Meta-análise de estudos populacionais padrão-ouro: https://t.co/7tJHrzJbPH Mecanismo molecular 2005: https://t.co/uOcJNh0Xuh Nature 2022: https://t.co/9JxynZJpbo +350 estudos 72% menos mortes co
@fademonkeyman @backtolife_2023 @wanituh They knew.....HCQ https://t.co/WzpVbz2oht
RT @sfbeatty: @dockaurG https://t.co/OUpv64J6ni Canadians doctors ignored 2005 study from University of Montreal and NIH https://t.co/Fau…
RT @bacca400: @VigilantFox A study in 2005 showed HCQ was effective against SARS-1. https://t.co/P4NWjdb4rN #hcq #covid19treatment #coronav…
@VigilantFox A study in 2005 showed HCQ was effective against SARS-1. https://t.co/P4NWjdb4rN #hcq #covid19treatment #coronaviruspandemic
@ScottAdamsSays And to be sure there were studies that showed that antiviral worked on SARS-1 back in 2005. Yes I looked these up in March of 2020. https://t.co/NqtafpX45P
RT @NTanzerin: @EltontoNick @SpartaJustice Heres a study from 2005 showing that Chloroquins like HCQ are potent viral inhibitors for corona…
RT @BatesBE: @drsimonegold @idawhannadoyou 2005 NIH/CDC website and check out the links to citations on the right-hand panel: (here is some…
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @BatesBE: @drsimonegold @idawhannadoyou 2005 NIH/CDC website and check out the links to citations on the right-hand panel: (here is some…
@drsimonegold @idawhannadoyou 2005 NIH/CDC website and check out the links to citations on the right-hand panel: (here is some of the science) https://t.co/TTSHqxf72u
@drsimonegold @idawhannadoyou Nice to see you back!! You might find this interesting: https://t.co/TTSHqxf72u
RT @skeptikosMMXX: (HIDROXI)CLOROQUINA FUNCIONA P/ COVID-19 !! meta-análise de estudos populacionais padrão-ouro: https://t.co/7tJHrzJbPH…
(HIDROXI)CLOROQUINA FUNCIONA P/ COVID-19 !! meta-análise de estudos populacionais padrão-ouro: https://t.co/7tJHrzJbPH mecanismo molecular 2005: https://t.co/uOcJNh0Xuh Nature 2022: https://t.co/9JxynZJpbo +450 estudos: 72% menos mortes com o uso de HCQ
@2020Olhos @schmittpaula @A2022V @2020Olhos, considere parar de afirmar o que vc não sabe, é ridículo. estudo populacional, padrão-ouro: https://t.co/7tJHrzJbPH mecanismo molecular 2005: https://t.co/uOcJNh0Xuh 2022: https://t.co/9JxynZJpbo 379 estudos: 72
RT @abikhalil_t: A study from 2005 shows that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” https…
Incase you missed it... #diedsuddenly https://t.co/rN3EQJMGm2
RT @NTanzerin: @EltontoNick @SpartaJustice Heres a study from 2005 showing that Chloroquins like HCQ are potent viral inhibitors for corona…
What about 2005 reports on chloroquine against SARS? https://t.co/EIF4tgFpjz
RT @NTanzerin: @EltontoNick @SpartaJustice Heres a study from 2005 showing that Chloroquins like HCQ are potent viral inhibitors for corona…
@fademonkeyman @backtolife_2023 @wanituh No, no catch. https://t.co/EP4lg8QhDO
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
RT @Michal4Nrmbrg2: #Hydroxychloroquine #Ivermectin #FauciKnew in 2005 that #HCQ was both a therapeutic & prophylactic, a #cure & a #vaccin…
@EltontoNick @SpartaJustice Heres a study from 2005 showing that Chloroquins like HCQ are potent viral inhibitors for coronaviruses.... your gov lied to you and you need to stop believing the pharma machine. https://t.co/tMVPJNol1t
@CollinRugg @KLSouth The 2005 NIH study linked here finds HCQ a Corona Virus Super Drug! https://t.co/1klEzGHdxn Yet in 2020 Fauci told us it was useless. Now we know it really does work. https://t.co/d4hj4XdtzX
RT @hoff_rob: @jeffreyatucker It's so sad, ironic, whatever that people drawing on the experiences from Sars-Cov-1 have been demonized for…
RT @concerned88: Virology Journal (2005) "Conclusion: Chloroquine, a relatively safe, effective + cheap drug used for treating many human d…
@leolabeth @randall_plant @EricTopol They lied about Natural Immunity as well as Chloroquine/Ivermectin. There's plenty more. I'm in no way attacking anyone I want us all to have peace and move fwd I just can't believe the lies anymore. https://t.co/yvas
@Holly_in_CA @DalyaOvadi @MattOnAir the whole article https://t.co/b2HmAM8l0s Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Like I said in vitro
@BefittingFacts @elonmusk Add this to your Facts. https://t.co/yvasG8B6VL
@TiwannaRN42 @LegalPatriotOne Published in 2005 about Chloroquine. https://t.co/QSVKS0WBgm
RT @Fatboyslimm: @Leedsleeds66 I just checked. It's real. https://t.co/VONfjjPpdG https://t.co/ypECsl9LYz
RT @Fatboyslimm: @Leedsleeds66 I just checked. It's real. https://t.co/VONfjjPpdG https://t.co/ypECsl9LYz
@Marcyyoma @DGisSERIOUS @elonmusk The 5G is Bullshit. Martin Kulldorff is a Harvard educated Epidemiologist, He's a quack? They knew Chloroquine and Ivermectin worked since 2005 here's the receipts. I thought it was BS too but facts don't gaf what I or any
RT @abikhalil_t: A study from 2005 shows that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” https…
@Herr_Quigley @SarlesBob This will clear it up. https://t.co/yvasG8B6VL
@SarlesBob They Knew since 2005 https://t.co/yvasG8B6VL
@EricTopol OK. I'd like an explanation here though. https://t.co/yvasG8B6VL
@AboutIndia @BipolarInventor @EricTopol @NEJM ? This seems like it works on some kind of sars coronavirus... https://t.co/HzbagJSCTN
@AtomsksSanakan @TigerlillySusan @JustOwnItIsrael @davideyoungmd @zute_alors @P_McCulloughMD @frank_zelenko Dude, it is LITERALLY in the NIH Archieves, sit this one out Princess. https://t.co/AJIT9MHvmW
@jakeshieldsajj The Zelenko Protocol & Hydroxychloroquine's dismissal was another nail in the coffin for us as it was shown to be effective in Sars-Cov-1. Everything the Governments around the globe was spouting did not hold water at all imo. We still
@JLimHospMD @nolibkidmomma Just as an interjection here. :) I wonder what you thoughts are on this doc? https://t.co/HzbagJSCTN
@TrollDonkey @DaBears7878 @RealCandaceO Education... Yes, let's remember ignorance is a choice when knowledge is virtually free. https://t.co/jPxJHAXCON Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread - NCBI https://t.co/rAFdvZU
RT @AgentOfLibertay: @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Check this out ... https://t.co/W6oWev6daG https://t.co/1rkaV8VzsL
@_MattSavino @CryptoGhuy @bubbaprog a'ight. Let's do this one step at a time. You: Why should I believe? He promoted HCQ. He lost all credibility with that. NIH, not him: https://t.co/5ykKksUaN2 Does that make it better? More credible?
@nickmmark You mean like this? https://t.co/xoC7WKICJF
@hodgetwins @1MoniqueWorthy Well, sure… they’d known since 2005 it worked against SARS, at least: https://t.co/Q0hkEEuSAY
@DrKellyVictory They’ve known since 2005 it was effective vs SARS-CoV. https://t.co/optPwYGsta