@GrantCardone In 2005 they said it works for sarscov https://t.co/7NPmYHdye3
@GrantCardone @jonbingnj 2005 study showing it IS EFFECTIVE https://t.co/7NPmYHdye3
RT @aurorabennu: @GrantCardone Hey guys. 2005 https://t.co/7NPmYHdye3
@GrantCardone Hey guys. 2005 https://t.co/7NPmYHdye3
@drdrew How about this one? Original SARS-Cov virus, study from Fauci's own department in 2005 demonstrating mechanisms for chloroquine's effectiveness. Chloroquine is more toxic pre-metabolite of hydroxychloroquine, and this is a close cousin to "Covid-
@CKellyUAP Check this NIH article on Chloroquine... https://t.co/XeXBxZ5k6v
@Victorshi2020 Please read the attached article, still available on the NIH website about the effectiveness of Chloroquine on the Covid virus. Then tell me why people were called idiots for using it, and why the NIH/WHO were against it, and going after Dr'
@realstewpeters . #putthatinyourpipe @JesseKellyDC @SteveDeaceShow @SaraGonzalesTX @sav_says_ @JeffyJFR 1000% or at least same odds that Western gubments said cheap therapeutics didn't work they knew did!!! @GOP @SpeakerMcCarthy @HouseGOP @JudiciaryGOP @T
RT @DIY_Tardis: @CKellyUAP Fact checkers incoming . https://t.co/pcueLE0KuE
@CKellyUAP Fact checkers incoming . https://t.co/pcueLE0KuE
@JackPosobiec From 2005 https://t.co/mQBVgjtAuD
@FatBALLS369 A cursory search results in several articles claiming this is a hoax, but here is a link to the Virology Journal article stored at the National Library of Medicine website: https://t.co/NOqP05ftbh
@MichaelPSenger @jimmy_dore HCQ works, and I have personal experience. The NIH thought it was a good idea too: https://t.co/IF71pemZRk
@katzz12 @Dabbler3338 @eagerrealist They proved HCQ’s effectiveness in 2005. Its in a published study for its efficacy against SARS coronaviruses but you can’t get emergency use authorization on a vaccine to make billions if an effective drug already exist
RT @TinaBr2: Fauci - why have you ignored this? https://t.co/MldwAQuVv5
@SteveSkojec When they suppressed HCQ as an option to prevent or mitigate symptoms, it seemed obvious that nothing to follow was about our health. Not one damned thing. https://t.co/Q0hkEEuSAY
@NA_BarryJansson @BrianLenzkes Glad you are OK. NOT AntiVax either but thats generally therapy. They Lied. https://t.co/yvasG8B6VL https://t.co/8kfD31mvD7
RT @carl_jurassic: @MichaelPSenger @jimmy_dore Of course they work. They’ve always worked https://t.co/fOFFsyzCMg https://t.co/d8jjWn20U8
@MichaelPSenger @jimmy_dore Of course they work. They’ve always worked https://t.co/fOFFsyzCMg https://t.co/d8jjWn20U8
RT @SteredL: @andrebercoff @morandiniblog le 12/11/2019 macron, philippe, salomon, buzyn faisaient classer l'hydroxychloroquine comme subst…
@Ray_Grant_ @invalid_search1 @kevinfolta @5Tbewrong @IanCopeland5 https://t.co/v3QYq5mijI Read it plenty. I mean, sure, anything better than 30% is considered a success, so they skirt blame for a 70% failure rate. wow, super effective. They also said t
@NoRationality Presumably, you are one of those ignorant souls who's unaware that Chloroquine was tested against the original SARS virus in 2005, and found to be super-effective. Read it and weep! https://t.co/o5Llvkj2db
@MichaelPSenger @jimmy_dore Fauci knew that HCQ was a powerful inhibitor of SARS. https://t.co/2KZis1HDra
@MichaelPSenger @jimmy_dore Early treatment known since 2005 study: "chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection" https://t.co/A3CFbYhIqo
@PokerPolitics Did Q have to name him? Pretty sure fauci put it out there almost 2 decades ago This was written by Fauci's NIH Article Virol J. 2005; 2: 69. Published online 👉2005 Aug 22👈 stating: HCQ/Chloroquine is the CURE and VACCINE for Sars-Coron
RT @Orchidoptera: @its_the_Dr And also - they knew this one in 2005: https://t.co/Q0hkEEuSAY
@its_the_Dr And also - they knew this one in 2005: https://t.co/Q0hkEEuSAY
@Burnt_Toast_22 @vicky_caudill @RonnyJacksonTX Wow. You still believe all the lies you've been spoon-fed by the people on your TV. I know that Democrats are allergic to doing their own research, but if you don't want to highlight your ignorance, you migh
@andrebercoff @morandiniblog le 12/11/2019 macron, philippe, salomon, buzyn faisaient classer l'hydroxychloroquine comme substance vénéneuse alors qu'il est un puissant inhibiteur du sars cov...il y a bien eu préméditation...il n'y aura pas de circonstance
@Mona87284429 Dans le même genre, il y a l'étude sur l'efficacité de la chloroquine contre le SARS-CoV n°1 publiée en 2005 par des chercheurs du CDC (voir mail ds pdf), dans la revue de ? Anthony Fauci, qui est à l'Advisory Board. https://t.co/xiM8EXgYkC h
@kennedy_texas @hudsontvdotcom They weren't tested for efficacy, The Pfizer Exec in the UK admitted it. Stop reading headlines and actually look into this info. They could have helped in using an already approved medication that was studied in 2005, you ma
@NototyrannyNOW @DavidWolfe #FauciLiedPeopleDied #FauciLiedMillionsDied #FauciFiles Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread Martin J Vincent et al. Virol J. 2005. Free PMC article https://t.co/PLHIVMiMom
RT @JarettsHa: Fauci knew all along and callously let people die because of TDS. https://t.co/9gyRLasVFI https://t.co/LNClJlxWqX
@wildtrailflow @RantsOnMute @davidjthunder @Mrs_K4rm4 Except I've not used the term "pure blood" either with or without "righteousness" or "lack of humility" so you're challenging something that's only in your imagination. Here, may as well start at the
@RWMaloneMD This should do the trick. https://t.co/yvasG8BELj
RT @andyblom00: @LenHarris44 @stkirsch Looks correct. This paper is from 2005. https://t.co/uelAfAJE14
@DrEliDavid Didn't know I had it until I took a blood test for antibodies. I took Hydroxy as was recommended by the NIH instead of waiting for Pfizer to save me https://t.co/IF71pemZRk
@mcfunny @13lrk @scot1222 @leslibless @wes_futureman @MariaRyanNH @CDCDirector @trvrb Nothing to see here, too, from 2005 about chloroquine and SARS. #icymi chloroquine has been used globally since ~1950 incl for Lupus, malaria & arthritis (prescribed
RT @abikhalil_t: A study from 2005 shows that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” https…
RT @randomherosa: @PierreKory Thankfully the NIH agrees that Chloroquine is effective treatment for SARS Covid. https://t.co/ZVnTP9R8XH
RT @randomherosa: @PierreKory Thankfully the NIH agrees that Chloroquine is effective treatment for SARS Covid. https://t.co/ZVnTP9R8XH
It gets better. Date and author. Yikes! https://t.co/9r1uhuloxs
@justervesen @Chilli_______p Men helsetoppene var fullstendig klar over at medisinene, som ble gjort ulovlig, funka. Hvorfor de løy, vet ikke jeg, men det er jo merkelig. Og mange forsøkte å si fra, men ble sensurert og demonisert https://t.co/gO7qWehpbQ
@CintiaReal1 @medicina_cfm This aged well. 🫠 https://t.co/yvasG8BELj
@mursebigford @gbosslet This aged like fine wine https://t.co/yvasG8BELj
@leelasik @TOPDOGE007 @nelsonepega So did the NIH. https://t.co/CiFZDbmQGI
@CrunchyBrown @WhiteLace83 @IanCopeland5 So you’re referring to this article https://t.co/d6bTkRtkH9 About SARS-CoV-1 that was released in 2005, right? This article that has nothing to do with SARS-CoV-2 because it’s a different virus? And then you want to
@KamelNutrition @WhiteLace83 @IanCopeland5 From 2005... 😂 https://t.co/mQBVgju8kb
@ThisIsGodsEarth @greenersmile @blberridge @LOVillaJavea They also knew, since 2005, that Chloroquine was an inhibitor of SARS coronavirus. https://t.co/g5iB9x38oN
@RWMaloneMD @hicksyalex @Project_Veritas @RWMaloneMD Are you aware of this study? Seems we've had an effective treatment since 2005. https://t.co/yvasG8BELj
@Project_Veritas Hey @pfizer I'd like to know if you're aware of this study? https://t.co/yvasG8BELj
@barryowen67 @theceng @PeterSweden7 Here’s a good study on chloroquine. https://t.co/yOnUzYDiMt. Come on let’s see your studies.
@cindi_feriby @mikemalter @RWMaloneMD More "propaganda" that worked on US and our loved ones.🤔 Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread Martin J Vincent et al. Virol J. 2005. https://t.co/QAtS1UQeM2
A study from 2005 by very CDC and the top Canadian scientists from Clinical Research Institute of Montreal, praised Chloroquine against SarsCov, for both prophylaxis and therapy: “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread“
@ProlificFuse @FedupWithFedEx2 @LodeStar_Awake @Patti_McGreen @AngelaSWenk Almost as if THEY ALREADY KNEW since 2005... Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread Martin J Vincent et al. Virol J. 2005. https://t.co/QAtS1UQe
RT @montaga: Dr. Fauci NIH report showing he knew how to treat COVID & did nothing but lie to the American Ppl They knew HCQ was the cure…
RT @andyblom00: @LenHarris44 @stkirsch Looks correct. This paper is from 2005. https://t.co/uelAfAJE14
RT @andyblom00: @LenHarris44 @stkirsch Looks correct. This paper is from 2005. https://t.co/uelAfAJE14
RT @andyblom00: @LenHarris44 @stkirsch Looks correct. This paper is from 2005. https://t.co/uelAfAJE14
RT @andyblom00: @LenHarris44 @stkirsch Looks correct. This paper is from 2005. https://t.co/uelAfAJE14
RT @andyblom00: @LenHarris44 @stkirsch Looks correct. This paper is from 2005. https://t.co/uelAfAJE14
RT @andyblom00: @LenHarris44 @stkirsch Looks correct. This paper is from 2005. https://t.co/uelAfAJE14
RT @andyblom00: @LenHarris44 @stkirsch Looks correct. This paper is from 2005. https://t.co/uelAfAJE14
RT @andyblom00: @LenHarris44 @stkirsch Looks correct. This paper is from 2005. https://t.co/uelAfAJE14
RT @andyblom00: @LenHarris44 @stkirsch Looks correct. This paper is from 2005. https://t.co/uelAfAJE14
RT @andyblom00: @LenHarris44 @stkirsch Looks correct. This paper is from 2005. https://t.co/uelAfAJE14
RT @andyblom00: @LenHarris44 @stkirsch Looks correct. This paper is from 2005. https://t.co/uelAfAJE14
@PierreKory Thankfully the NIH agrees that Chloroquine is effective treatment for SARS Covid. https://t.co/ZVnTP9R8XH
Wat vinden we nou toch! https://t.co/w6IWoPP5AM https://t.co/Emzqw9ceNw
@LenHarris44 @stkirsch Looks correct. This paper is from 2005. https://t.co/uelAfAJE14
@freedomyaiyai @goddeketal There is a 2005 in vitro study on chloroquine, not hydroxychloroquine, for SARS. It was not an NIH study. It was done by the Clinical Research Institute of Montreal and the CDC. https://t.co/C38GuLzFUz