RT @FakeMediaNews: @StormyBotK Guess where #FauciFraud worked? NIH What did the NIH know? Hydroxychloroquine effective,consistently so wh…
@StormyBotK Guess where #FauciFraud worked? NIH What did the NIH know? Hydroxychloroquine effective,consistently so when provided early https://t.co/9PHciighaa Chloroquine since 2005(!)combat coronavirus https://t.co/exp7lFonZH 2005Aug“chloroquine has s
@__TEAM_USA @tedcruz Guess where #FauciFraud worked? NIH What did NIH know? Hydroxychloroquine effective,consistently so when provided early https://t.co/9PHciighaa Chloroquine since 2005(!)combat coronavirus https://t.co/exp7lFonZH 2005Aug“chloroquine
@elonmusk @DrJBhattacharya Guess where #FauciFraud worked? NIH What did the NIH know? Hydroxychloroquine effective,consistently so when provided early https://t.co/9PHciighaa Chloroquine since 2005(!)combat coronavirus https://t.co/exp7lFonZH 2005Aug“c
@kyryan1988 @dense_evi @VigilantFox @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/odsxxhn3RG Just sayin…..🤷🏻♀️
RT @TVMADoc: @MsBlaireWhite Hydroxychloroquine (less toxic metabolite of chloroquine) not "safe or effective", when it's incredibly safe an…
@mieke2 @koen_verhagen @ElsVeen2 @hapelensrob idd, net als Chloroquine. (met voorbedachte rade) https://t.co/Fwzr3i3bwf
@BrentLeeAllan1 @Rich04891613 @happycrazytown @ksorbs So is this, but Fauci and his sympathizers on social media made sure nobody could mention it for 2 years, not doctors, not scientists, nobody. Some doctors who tried it lost their licenses, some pharmac
@bocesrn @JenniferSey 🤣 Promoted bogus cures From 2005 https://t.co/g5iB9x2Azf
@VSA_F1 @NellekeBakker Hey annoniem flexpertje ...wakker worden.. 2005 : https://t.co/Ti8FZZC65f
@AliNeitzelMD @SenRonJohnson Maybe you should do ACTUAL medical research! https://t.co/Ckolkch8FZ
RT @RightWingDiva20: They could have allowed for the EUA for Hydroxychloroquine to treat and prevent C19. But they didn't and people are dr…
Best taken early… Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread | Virology Journal | Full Text https://t.co/uBzM1EsCqx
RT @1stacyphillips: @jeremyfaust Watched your testimony today in Dr. Nass' trial where you are trying to pull her medical license because s…
I just watched @jeremyfaust's testimony in Dr. Nass' trial where he's trying to pull her med. license because she treated patients early w/ hydroxychloroquine. I think HE should be on trial for NOT recommending it. SHAMEFUL. 2005 study by CDC scientists:
@jeremyfaust Watched your testimony today in Dr. Nass' trial where you are trying to pull her medical license because she treated patients early w/ hydroxychloroquine. I think YOU should be on trial for NOT recommending it. SHAMEFUL. 2005 study by CDC sc
RT @TinaBr2: Fauci - why have you ignored this? https://t.co/MldwAQuVv5
@Anfva @Terissa44662380 @OmarRiverosays Lying to people to push a drug that you're paid cosigned by the organization your wife runs dismissing cheap affordable medication to push a toxic experiment is a crime against humanity. He knows chloroquine worked,
@Fan2La88 @MsBlaireWhite https://t.co/NvSYvNrwhW NIAND has a study from 2005 demonstrating at least three mechanisms of action for chloroquine inhibiting the original SARS-Cov virus.
@MsBlaireWhite Hydroxychloroquine (less toxic metabolite of chloroquine) not "safe or effective", when it's incredibly safe and Fauci's own agency had a 2005 study demonstrating the multiple ways that chloroquine inhibited SARS-Cov-1 (very close cousin to
RT @rstreet1319: @CKellyUAP @QNTistheKEY The NIH knew as far back as 2005….not long after the CDC made sure the SARS virus was controlled w…
RT @rstreet1319: @CKellyUAP @QNTistheKEY The NIH knew as far back as 2005….not long after the CDC made sure the SARS virus was controlled w…
@tomselliott @NicolleDWallace All conversations about Fauci should begin and end with this document. From the NIH in 2005 titled: "Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread" https://t.co/5khpLWtytU Crimes against humanity?
RT @PushFourLeft: @Roper_Lab @LisaLyo83699299 @ci2twit @DeniseRa1 @drscott_atlanta You probably also believe HCQ and Ivermectin are ineffec…
@AlexBerenson @PierreKory @SteveDeaceShow @washingtonpost The duo works against many viruses. FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro https://t.co/wKSYsH0VHz Chloroquine is a potent
@Roper_Lab @LisaLyo83699299 @ci2twit @DeniseRa1 @drscott_atlanta You probably also believe HCQ and Ivermectin are ineffective for early Covid: Why do you push proven lies? https://t.co/GMrst3Winh
@AlexBerenson I guess you are going to trash those who pushed hydroxychloroquine also eh? We were flat out lied to about HCQ and Ivermectin Alex: https://t.co/GMrst3Winh
RT @DIY_Tardis: @Dharmen46587056 @richardursomd The idea didn't come from nowhere . https://t.co/pcueLE0KuE
@AdnauseamA @realJZervos @Inarus_Lynx @krassenstein You do realize this is a Virology Paper written under Faucis control of the NIH right? Chloroquine is a potent 👉inhibitor👈 of SARS coronavirus infection and spread Virol J. 2005; 2: 69. Published onli
RT @DIY_Tardis: @Dharmen46587056 @richardursomd The idea didn't come from nowhere . https://t.co/pcueLE0KuE
@Dharmen46587056 @richardursomd The idea didn't come from nowhere . https://t.co/pcueLE0KuE
@ed_eichman @AlexBerenson And we've known it since at least 2005: Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/xcnyqFykgV
@MCessac @AlexBerenson And this was early; June 2020. Chloroquine too, in 2005: Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/xcnyqFykgV
RT @MaryATackett: @rfmad ‼️chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells virology journal article from 20…
@rfmad ‼️chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells virology journal article from 2005 https://t.co/qH7FhwfSL2
@WBBanner @AlexBerenson Huge #s Dr. reports too; dramatic improvemt O2 sats at 36-48hrs. Known from 2005: Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/xcnyqFykgV
@Farm2Dog @AlexBerenson And chloroquine: Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/xcnyqFykgV
@LuluAddict @AlexBerenson Great comment! And this study from 2005 (back before "science" was so badly corrupted): Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/xcnyqFykgV
RT @rstreet1319: @CKellyUAP @QNTistheKEY The NIH knew as far back as 2005….not long after the CDC made sure the SARS virus was controlled w…
2005 onderzoek! https://t.co/RRAJdqarhW
@krassenstein This is a good conspirafact, Fauci knew HCQ was the "Cure/Vaccine" for Sars Coronavirus back in 2005 yet big medicine banned the cure of a 99.9% survivable disease...Y? 😬...🍿 Virol J. 2005; 2: 69. Published online 2005 Aug 22. https://t.co/
RT @kck321: @AdnauseamA @realJZervos @Inarus_Lynx @krassenstein It's funny everyone wants to dismiss this information from 2005 yet it stil…
@AdnauseamA @realJZervos @Inarus_Lynx @krassenstein It's funny everyone wants to dismiss this information from 2005 yet it still stands today to be the "Cure" as Fauci called it way back then, no one needed to die during this 99.9% survivable plandemic Vi
@ShannonJoyRadio . #putthatinyourpipe @JesseKellyDC @SteveDeaceShow @SaraGonzalesTX @sav_says_ @JeffyJFR @ReinetteSenum I'm slower than Shannon so 6 or 7 April 2020 when Trump touted HCQ & INSTANTLY media was in lock step touting it dangerous and I sa
@docchai2022 @KanekoaTheGreat Please get a brain! Fauci was the head of NIH for decades and in 2005, under his directions, NIH discovered this 👇 ...and why is this relevant? Because Covid-19 has identified as a SARS like virus!! https://t.co/nkRwX59z3F
RT @rstreet1319: @CKellyUAP @QNTistheKEY The NIH knew as far back as 2005….not long after the CDC made sure the SARS virus was controlled w…
@JustinTrudeau 1.The Canadian Gov't & federal/provincial chief medical officers have spread 'misinformations' in effect advocating for the pharma behemoths by gaslighting the existing therapies. 2005 study by the top CDC &Canadian scientists : htt
RT @rstreet1319: @CKellyUAP @QNTistheKEY The NIH knew as far back as 2005….not long after the CDC made sure the SARS virus was controlled w…
RT @montaga: Dr. Fauci NIH report showing he knew how to treat COVID & did nothing but lie to the American Ppl They knew HCQ was the cure…
@CKellyUAP @QNTistheKEY The NIH knew as far back as 2005….not long after the CDC made sure the SARS virus was controlled with patents. https://t.co/QTTOWtNQcz
@wardenmaster @Marston4ca42 @bbqsmokemann @EdKrassen Dr. Thomas Cowan Dr. Andrew Kaufman Dr. Stefan Lanka Dr. Lipten Dr. Beachump Dr. Sehi Dr. Dispenza Dr. David Martin Dr. Reiner Fullmich https://t.co/1N6iJm378S https://t.co/bxyAKZzEO1 Look those up
@DrEliDavid https://t.co/wzexSACSi5 Of course they knew what they were doing. So many lies. #FauciLied #COVID #WEF @WHO @CDCgov @CDCDirector @DrTedros #Masks #VaccineMandates #BigPharma #chloroquine #Ivermectin Instead they want to give you #Remdesivir
@indigobunt @AprilMayo03 @SabinehazanMD From 2005 Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/wdtguCQF0D
Weet je nog dat [ze] Ivermectine "paarden ontwormer" noemden?, en de effectiviteit ervan ontkende. Die lui zijn schuldig aan moord. https://t.co/Sgg4xwOJtA https://t.co/dndO0tBkYf https://t.co/y1aOTpukQB
@Gatess_37 @hams931 @jeanmarcpron @BPartisans le Lancet a rapidement rétracté son étude "prouvant" son inefficacité -HCQ prouvée inhibiteur InVitro du tout 1er SARS en 2005 -et lors d’essais > https://t.co/4utP25oJwG https://t.co/bAf8ejD2eH https://t.co
@brigles2 @RaisingSqrPegs @IanCopeland5 Thank you in advance for the studies. HCQ being used for decades means nothing if it’s ineffective. This statement is completely wrong. “Recommended by NIH under Fauci 10 years ago for SARS-Cov-1, but HCQ was “too
@AndyMCollings @ClareCraigPath And how about estimate the number of deaths that could have been prevented had early treatment been initiated. We knew in 2005 that chloroquine was effective vs many RNA viruses https://t.co/xcnyqFykgV
RT @rstreet1319: @MamaCass999 @goddeketal @PeterHotez I’d actually found the NIH study in 2020. I’m surprised it’s not been taken down. htt…
@MamaCass999 @goddeketal @PeterHotez I’d actually found the NIH study in 2020. I’m surprised it’s not been taken down. https://t.co/QTTOWtNQcz
@TyWebbsBombers @themediawitch @AntonioSabatoJr "In this report, we describe the identification of chloroquine as an effective pre- and post-infection antiviral agent for SARS-CoV." https://t.co/vv4f7hhjtx
RT @ESGCanQueSherby: Nous ont-ils menti sur l'hydroxychloroquine ? -le Lancet a rapidement rétracté son étude "prouvant" son inefficacité -…
Nous ont-ils menti sur l'hydroxychloroquine ? -le Lancet a rapidement rétracté son étude "prouvant" son inefficacité -HCQ prouvée inhibiteur InVitro du tout 1er SARS en 2005 -et lors d’essais > https://t.co/XVJqOuI0WH https://t.co/2K1EUnG7as https://t.c
RT @montaga: Dr. Fauci NIH report showing he knew how to treat COVID & did nothing but lie to the American Ppl They knew HCQ was the cure…
@SebGorka LoL there were already nih studies before that for another Covid variant… where do you think they came up with the idea? 2005 study for sars Covid…https://t.co/3Ha7eFJtcA
@Drooski @SebGorka They knew. https://t.co/1nfC5lLEIF
@Phillyboy1776 @SebGorka Bullshit! https://t.co/1nfC5lLEIF
@cdought @SebGorka How about this study? https://t.co/1nfC5lLEIF
@SebGorka @SebGorka They knew it in 2005. https://t.co/1nfC5lLEIF
@SebGorka Look at date on paper! They Knew! https://t.co/TTqFeFgW1N
RT @ToeNegro: Jak tylko nazwano wirusa celebrytę przedrostkiem SARS to CQ i HCQ były czymś co od razu się nasuwało na myśl ze względu na si…
RT @ToeNegro: Jak tylko nazwano wirusa celebrytę przedrostkiem SARS to CQ i HCQ były czymś co od razu się nasuwało na myśl ze względu na si…