RT @MerdeJacques: @SSchult66805611 Of Course... The worst-case scenario had to be pushed to get people to voluntarily run to get the COVID…
RT @PeaknikMicki: @lovetocook12345 Took orally, not injected, as as advised by his doctor. Calling it a vaccine is a bit of misnomer (but…
@SSchult66805611 Of Course... The worst-case scenario had to be pushed to get people to voluntarily run to get the COVID shots... Now what was in the shots that the Globalists wanted in the world's population's arms? Meanwhile, it appears they had the cur
@USAPatPhilly @lovetocook12345 What do you mean? It was news at the time Trump has been advised by his physician to take HCQ as a prophylaxis. Media and dems when ape shit and the Lancet published a hack job that later got retracted to stop use of HCQ. ht
@ginamom343 @lovetocook12345 Trump took HCQ as a prophylactic after advise from his doctor. Media, Fauci, the dems etc went on full war against HCQ to have it banned. Even the Lancet published a hack job that later got retracted and many countries banned
@SparkleCityStar @lovetocook12345 People didn't die from HCQ. Only, the later retracted, paper in the Lancet tried to paint such picture. Many dr swore by it's efficacy. But had it been allowed, the experimental 💉could not have been pushed. That's why i
@dguardi @lovetocook12345 Yeah, calling it 'vaccine' is a complete misnomer. But he took it as a prophylactic not as a therapeutic. https://t.co/yBvyj0lfx2
@lovetocook12345 Took orally, not injected, as as advised by his doctor. Calling it a vaccine is a bit of misnomer (but who knows what the definition is now as they change on a whim) but it was taken as a prophylactic, hence they referred to it as 'vaccin
La chloroquine est un puissant inhibiteur de l'infection et de la propagation du coronavirus du SRAS (Virology Journal, 2005) https://t.co/iOCHfw1TBN
RT @SteredL: @Dover63A @MLP_officiel Un "criminel de guerre" sans circonstances atténuantes ayant fait classer l'hydroxychloroquine comme s…
@mvankerkhove @rpi @WHO @DrTedros @DrMikeRyan How did the experts™ not know about/Why did you hide this 2005 study? While vilifying life-saving treatments? Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection & spread https://t.co/wdtguCQF
RT @SteredL: @Dover63A @MLP_officiel Un "criminel de guerre" sans circonstances atténuantes ayant fait classer l'hydroxychloroquine comme s…
RT @SteredL: @Dover63A @MLP_officiel Un "criminel de guerre" sans circonstances atténuantes ayant fait classer l'hydroxychloroquine comme s…
RT @SteredL: @Dover63A @MLP_officiel Un "criminel de guerre" sans circonstances atténuantes ayant fait classer l'hydroxychloroquine comme s…
RT @SteredL: @Dover63A @MLP_officiel Un "criminel de guerre" sans circonstances atténuantes ayant fait classer l'hydroxychloroquine comme s…
RT @SteredL: @Dover63A @MLP_officiel Un "criminel de guerre" sans circonstances atténuantes ayant fait classer l'hydroxychloroquine comme s…
RT @poulemaccartney: @VTrillet_Lenoir La chloroquine est un puissant inhibiteur de l'infection et de la propagation du coronavirus du SRAS…
RT @poulemaccartney: @VTrillet_Lenoir La chloroquine est un puissant inhibiteur de l'infection et de la propagation du coronavirus du SRAS…
@KelleyAshbyPaul Did you know that Fauci's NIH published this study in 2005: "Chloroquine potent inhibitor or SARS Coronavirus infection and spread". https://t.co/m1K8J9wmfG
RT @poulemaccartney: @VTrillet_Lenoir La chloroquine est un puissant inhibiteur de l'infection et de la propagation du coronavirus du SRAS…
RT @poulemaccartney: @VTrillet_Lenoir La chloroquine est un puissant inhibiteur de l'infection et de la propagation du coronavirus du SRAS…
RT @poulemaccartney: @VTrillet_Lenoir La chloroquine est un puissant inhibiteur de l'infection et de la propagation du coronavirus du SRAS…
RT @SteredL: @Dover63A @MLP_officiel Un "criminel de guerre" sans circonstances atténuantes ayant fait classer l'hydroxychloroquine comme s…
RT @poulemaccartney: @VTrillet_Lenoir La chloroquine est un puissant inhibiteur de l'infection et de la propagation du coronavirus du SRAS…
@VTrillet_Lenoir La chloroquine est un puissant inhibiteur de l'infection et de la propagation du coronavirus du SRAS On le sait depuis 2005 ! https://t.co/NyiYH85zlR
RT @SteredL: @Dover63A @MLP_officiel Un "criminel de guerre" sans circonstances atténuantes ayant fait classer l'hydroxychloroquine comme s…
@philippeherlin Alors que depuis 2005: https://t.co/Oo3ruMap9t
@Dover63A @MLP_officiel Un "criminel de guerre" sans circonstances atténuantes ayant fait classer l'hydroxychloroquine comme substance vénéneuses avec préméditation le 12/11/2019 et par décret le 20/01/2020 signé par Buzyn -Salomon Alors que depuis 2005 o
The Chinese have a tiger by the tail, and we have at least 5 cases here. Do we want to buy some time by shutting down air travel between China and other Hotspots? By the way, my staff found this on Chloroquine, HCQ https://t.co/HKv8Eryo42 Might be worth a
@dksdata @GovCanHealth I hear ya... Here is the NIH study... Thats Dr. Fauci's people in 2005 stated that Chloroquine is the go-to drug to use against SARS COVID... Yet they forced this sh!t on the world. What was in those clot shots? Graphene Oxide? h
@SpartaJustice @DrAseemMalhotra @Jay_Naidoo @P_McCulloughMD @NickHudsonCT @bevschafer @jsteenhuisen @RobertKennedyJr @rustyrockets @joerogan @OzraeliAvi They had the cure in 2005 and hid it from the people... pennies a dose. https://t.co/4BbwNpOGLD
@nco_mom @GovCanHealth @JustinTrudeau @jyduclos @cafreeland @karinagould @CPHO_Canada They knew since 2005... https://t.co/4BbwNpOGLD
@GovCanHealth Scratch off COVID... https://t.co/4BbwNpOGLD
@CPHO_Canada Scratch off COVID... https://t.co/4BbwNpOGLD
RT @OneMinPsychic: @RayArmat @SidneyPowell1 It's been in my profile since 2020 (check it out) They've known since '05 https://t.co/THTngKA…
@JosephArmand1 @TimSelf19 @Generali11 @VigilantFox I sent you plenty of information and ways to research it. This is a favorite from SARS 1. In case HCQ interests you https://t.co/0j8iWkOufZ
@RayArmat @SidneyPowell1 It's been in my profile since 2020 (check it out) They've known since '05 https://t.co/THTngKAoda
@atRachelGilmore Why don't you go ask your boyfriend, Justin why he put Canadians through hell during COVID when there was a well-established cure since 2005 that could have saved countless lives. Do your fuk'n job! https://t.co/4BbwNpOGLD
@Motomom128302 did you see this BS? BTW, They knew about the cure for SARS COVID in 2005... What was in those shots??? https://t.co/4BbwNpOGLD
@JustinTrudeau, through mandates, limiting of freedoms, movements, and ability to work, the Trudeau Liberals did force citizens to get the jab in order to put food on their plates, to pay their mortgage or rent. The cure was recognized in 2005. https://t
@JustinTrudeau BULL MERDE! It was known in 2005 that HCQ is effective at curing SARS COVID viruses. What was the deal with the globalists & Big Pharma? And yes, you did mandate the COVID shots by limiting freedoms including the right to work. htt
When can we talk about this scientific paper that was published in 2005? How is it that this has been known for this long and yet people argue there’s no evidence to show it could work as a treatment? https://t.co/iJCxOueCw0
@GeorgeFareed2 @btysonmd @EduEngineer @FairfieldView @jathorpmfm @VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD @drcole12 @OdyseeTeam 1) Remember, from August 2005. Take 2 HCQ and an aspirin, call me in the morning. https://t.co/HKv8Eryo42
@shadygrooove @RobertKennedyJr @TuckerCarlson Holy shit. It’s true. https://t.co/iJCxOueCw0
RT @Melchizedek1972: @JJeff4t @Michael_Yon @Utaylor8Y @BenBergquam @Oscarelblue @ganaha_masako The mentioned drugs have antiviral propertie…
Cette littérature date de 2005 : https://t.co/fwlqHjCYGZ Le collège des médecins s'appuyait sur des données scientifiques disponibles... pour ne pas l'utiliser ! Ahouain, lesquelles ? https://t.co/XEvGUh85o6 https://t.co/hjiTrpq9D3
@Rafayse Vai tomar no Kooooo vc, sua burra. Se vc soubesse pesquisar melhor, não comeria só nesses cochichos aí onde vc se lambuza. As verdades são destorcidas para acobertar à esquerda e continuar com a cólera em burros como vc. https://t.co/0P0qIa3mlg
So many people are unaware..
@JJeff4t @Michael_Yon @Utaylor8Y @BenBergquam @Oscarelblue @ganaha_masako The mentioned drugs have antiviral properties. Something the medical establishment and pharmaceutical companies have been desperate to suppress. Millions died needlessly to further
@Dr_Steph_GAYET Écrit depuis 2005 et c'est pour cela qu'elle à été classée substance vénéneuse par Salomon - Buzin sur avis le 12/11/2019, 3 semaines après la répétition générale du "coronacircus" à New York le 18/10/2019 lors du Forum de Davos ...il y a
RT @dogwidahat: @JackMedia7 The Shots should be pulled. HCQ works. Fauci and NIH said so in 2005. https://t.co/V1hKOm0B52
RT @Craig1454: Published online 2005 Aug 22. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 PMCID: PMC1232869 PMID: 16115318 Chloroquine is a potent inhibi…
RT @Craig1454: Published online 2005 Aug 22. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 PMCID: PMC1232869 PMID: 16115318 Chloroquine is a potent inhibi…
RT @Craig1454: Published online 2005 Aug 22. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 PMCID: PMC1232869 PMID: 16115318 Chloroquine is a potent inhibi…
RT @Craig1454: Published online 2005 Aug 22. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 PMCID: PMC1232869 PMID: 16115318 Chloroquine is a potent inhibi…
RT @Craig1454: Published online 2005 Aug 22. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 PMCID: PMC1232869 PMID: 16115318 Chloroquine is a potent inhibi…
RT @Craig1454: Published online 2005 Aug 22. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 PMCID: PMC1232869 PMID: 16115318 Chloroquine is a potent inhibi…
RT @Craig1454: Published online 2005 Aug 22. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 PMCID: PMC1232869 PMID: 16115318 Chloroquine is a potent inhibi…
RT @Craig1454: Published online 2005 Aug 22. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 PMCID: PMC1232869 PMID: 16115318 Chloroquine is a potent inhibi…
RT @Craig1454: Published online 2005 Aug 22. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 PMCID: PMC1232869 PMID: 16115318 Chloroquine is a potent inhibi…
Published online 2005 Aug 22. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 PMCID: PMC1232869 PMID: 16115318 Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/V54EYyJn0T https://t.co/Pb3ZRE6GCs
@JordanA8156 @DorianMichelle1 @Vhill01884628 @CollinRugg You've been played! https://t.co/Vsp5dT6eGa
@michaelpsenger AT START THEY (#Fauci/NIH) SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST MENTIONED THAT #HCQ WAS #PROPHYLACTIC & #CURE FOR SARS1/#COVID02 & SARS2/#COVID19! #ZelenkoProtocol Instead they (#Fauci/NIH) let MILLIONS DIE WORLDWIDE for $! PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE as of
AT START THEY (#Fauci/NIH) SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST MENTIONED THAT #HCQ WAS #PROPHYLACTIC & #CURE FOR SARS1/#COVID02 & SARS2/#COVID19! #ZelenkoProtocol Instead they (#Fauci/NIH) let MILLIONS DIE WORLDWIDE for $! PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE as of 2005 ON NIH WEB
@elonmusk @DrJBhattacharya AT START THEY (#Fauci/NIH) SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST MENTIONED THAT #HCQ WAS #PROPHYLACTIC & #CURE FOR SARS1/#COVID02 & SARS2/#COVID19! #ZelenkoProtocol Instead they (#Fauci/NIH) let MILLIONS DIE WORLDWIDE for $! PUBLIC KNOW
@kylenabecker FAUCI/NIH KNEW BY 2005 NO VAX, NO LOCKDOWNS WERE NEEDED & #HCQ IS PROPHYLACTIC & CURE FOR SARS-CoV1 & 2/COVID02 & COVID19! #FauciLiedMillionsDIED Fauci/NIH funded SARS/COVID design! #FollowTheMONEY CURE = #ZelenkoProtocol P
@elonmusk @KanekoaTheGreat FAUCI/NIH KNEW BY 2005 NO VAX, NO LOCKDOWNS WERE NEEDED & #HCQ IS PROPHYLACTIC & CURE FOR SARS-CoV1 & 2/COVID02 & COVID19! #FauciLiedMillionsDIED Fauci/NIH funded SARS/COVID design! #FollowTheMONEY CURE = #Zelen
@KanekoaTheGreat FAUCI/NIH KNEW BY 2005 NO VAX, NO LOCKDOWNS WERE NEEDED & #HCQ IS PROPHYLACTIC & CURE FOR SARS-CoV1 & 2/COVID02 & COVID19! #FauciLiedMillionsDIED Fauci/NIH funded SARS/COVID design! #FollowTheMONEY CURE = #ZelenkoProtocol
@ByronHsu2 @growthfactororg @DocRuddy NO!! That is NOT true! Unfortunately, it appears they have scrubbed them from the net. There were 3-4 studies I actually read early on. Every single animal in all the studies died. They died after getting exposed to wi
Pour rappel : ce n’est pas un traitement du COVID-19 ANSM Les données publiées à ce jour ne sont pas en faveur d’un bénéfice clinique de l’hydroxychloroquine, associée ou non à l’azithromycine https://t.co/v5rudw7hlT alors que : https://t.co/Oo3ruMap9t
@TheDemonClown @TavorX95 @MereteVonDOE @donmoyn @GavinNewsom You are aware it has other uses. Hcq has been known to fights Sars. https://t.co/H3yIO76Nif
@Nattjager @caronazo Så du ikke linken jeg gav deg, som viser at den er ekte? https://t.co/uCTzKrOX8k
@Nattjager @caronazo Fake som ikke er fake? https://t.co/vD1QkcHwdY https://t.co/3DAAcctSkQ
@Nattjager @caronazo Fortsatt ingen som har bruk for mere penger ??? En veldig viktig del av HCQ behandlinga er zink, altfor mange studie så på HCQ alene, det er med zink at den er effektiv. Debunk i vei; https://t.co/uCTzKrOX8k
RT @TinaBr2: Fauci - why have you ignored this? https://t.co/MldwAQuVv5
@GarciaVictor_ Et la chloroquine ? https://t.co/nHc8hlctae
@YvesPDB Rappel : les signataires du classement de l’hydroxychloroquine comme substance vénéneuse ...avec préméditation le 12/11/2019 alors qu'il était le traitement alternatif...des criminel "de guerre" ...la prison ou la potence ??? 2005... https://t.co/
@CKellyUAP .... and way back in 2005, Fauci's National Institute of Health's Journal of Virology published this in the NIH's National Library of Medicine - regarding SARS CoV1: https://t.co/m1K8J9wmfG
RT @EnemyInAState: And you'll come across a lot of stuff about potential drugs that can repurposed: one of those went onto form Paxlovid: w…
And you'll come across a lot of stuff about potential drugs that can repurposed: one of those went onto form Paxlovid: which is an old HIV 3CL pro inhibitor mixed with a new a 'new' anti viral: But hydroxy is mentioned a lot in those papers https://t.co
RT @PIAccount1: @jeffreyatucker The evidence demonstrates that the vaccines are much less effective than chloroquine. We knew that it woul…
@jeffreyatucker The evidence demonstrates that the vaccines are much less effective than chloroquine. We knew that it would be effective in 2005. We could have given it to everyone for a few dollars per person, and this all would have been over 3 years ag
@sethjlevy I can't believe this Tweet is over 3 years old. When I Tweeted it, Trump had not yet mentioned chloroquine, and it was not yet controversial. We knew back in 2005 that it would work, too, as this PubMed research paper regarding SARS demonstrat