RT @NotCricket2: @toadmeister Fauci knew back in 2005: a paper from his own NIH - "chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV inf…
RT @DavidWPittsMD: @KLVeritas A research paper from 2005 proved that Chloroquine was successful in treating SARS which is caused by a clo…
@WeAreWoke1776_3 @doqholliday H for Hebrew Q4114 https://t.co/GkOdQe5hbj https://t.co/Isnda1EXZO the protein sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding site was analyzed, an interesting result was found. While SARS-CoV-2 is overall more similar to bat c
RT @DavidWPittsMD: @KLVeritas A research paper from 2005 proved that Chloroquine was successful in treating SARS which is caused by a clo…
RT @DavidWPittsMD: @KLVeritas A research paper from 2005 proved that Chloroquine was successful in treating SARS which is caused by a clo…
RT @NotCricket2: @toadmeister Fauci knew back in 2005: a paper from his own NIH - "chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV inf…
RT @NotCricket2: @toadmeister Fauci knew back in 2005: a paper from his own NIH - "chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV inf…
@toadmeister Fauci knew back in 2005: a paper from his own NIH - "chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells" https://t.co/jXzBcZR7wa
RT @DavidWPittsMD: @KLVeritas A research paper from 2005 proved that Chloroquine was successful in treating SARS which is caused by a clo…
RT @DavidWPittsMD: @KLVeritas A research paper from 2005 proved that Chloroquine was successful in treating SARS which is caused by a clo…
RT @DavidWPittsMD: @KLVeritas A research paper from 2005 proved that Chloroquine was successful in treating SARS which is caused by a clo…
RT @DavidWPittsMD: @KLVeritas A research paper from 2005 proved that Chloroquine was successful in treating SARS which is caused by a clo…
RT @DavidWPittsMD: @KLVeritas A research paper from 2005 proved that Chloroquine was successful in treating SARS which is caused by a clo…
RT @DavidWPittsMD: @KLVeritas A research paper from 2005 proved that Chloroquine was successful in treating SARS which is caused by a clo…
So do tell us why HCQ was restricted here as early as Mar/Apr 2020? On what basis was this done @Mark_Butler_MP @healthgovau @TGAgovau @ShannonFentiman @Ros_Bates_MP seeing https://t.co/HbwDwOItje Say What @newscomauHQ @7NewsAustralia @abcnews @9NewsAUS @a
RT @DavidWPittsMD: @KLVeritas A research paper from 2005 proved that Chloroquine was successful in treating SARS which is caused by a clo…
Well then send the surplus to Florida to help us combat a malaria outbreak.
RT @DavidWPittsMD: @KLVeritas A research paper from 2005 proved that Chloroquine was successful in treating SARS which is caused by a clo…
RT @DavidWPittsMD: @KLVeritas A research paper from 2005 proved that Chloroquine was successful in treating SARS which is caused by a clo…
RT @DavidWPittsMD: @KLVeritas A research paper from 2005 proved that Chloroquine was successful in treating SARS which is caused by a clo…
@KLVeritas A research paper from 2005 proved that Chloroquine was successful in treating SARS which is caused by a closely related Coronavirus.. the reason why they did not use it.. if successful there would of not been able to use the new untested vacci
RT @newscoreca: 2005 research by Laboratory of Biochemical Neuroendocrinology, Clinical Research Institute of Montreal found "Chloroquine i…
@FinchTH I remember discovering this 2005 paper in December 2019. https://t.co/5cKVY6cX9d By March, I'd reviewed real-world data that confirmed it also worked for what was, then, the "novel coronavirus". The world hasn't looked the same ever since. http
Of course they knew. NIH discovered HCQ was a "wonder drug" for COVID They were paid to bury it. Here's your proof: https://t.co/1klEzGHdxn https://t.co/YWzQBh8cl7
Another source @JackStr42679640 https://t.co/9UgzhBobU3
@JackStr42679640 Here is the full article for anyone wanting read the actual paper. https://t.co/sRWVJXkN4S
They have known since 2005 https://t.co/81QwDWIq6u
@MAGAGEM1 @CKellyUAP @AlboMP @Bowenchris Yes & they restricted it 7 April 2020 .. how did they know it wouldn’t work that early .. seeing that in 2005 for sars “1” https://t.co/9CSnEzovka
Interesting. https://t.co/eFN1iNMBoZ
RT @ConnieHarvey66: @CKellyUAP Craig what may even reflect more evil doing Is that they knew this back in 2009. The National institute of H…
@CKellyUAP Craig what may even reflect more evil doing Is that they knew this back in 2009. The National institute of Health even presented a paper proving that an inhibits sars coronavirus They KNEW it helped and blocked access to it. https://t.co/Ip7uQ
RT @DschlopesIsBack: Posted by Dr. Zelenko on June 6th, 2021: https://t.co/dDicTyeJbl Published 2005. Please read the conclusion. Then at…
@ImpulseDelight @MarcoErmini2 @tushargundev @NobelPrize Here is one paper, there are many. It’s easy to find but you have to look: https://t.co/KYhSE4SCDQ
@GfveGianfra @Palazzo_Chigi @GiorgiaMeloni @FratellidItalia @LegaSalvini @Aifa_ufficiale @ISSalute_it @GiulioMarini2 Se è per questo erano disponibili già dalla prima sars.. https://t.co/IIEe7SqnP1
@alexnijenhuis @Kees71234 HCQ werkt https://t.co/ul1nGb76YE
RT @DschlopesIsBack: Posted by Dr. Zelenko on June 6th, 2021: https://t.co/dDicTyeJbl Published 2005. Please read the conclusion. Then at…
@ImMeme0 Fauci knew about Hydroxychloroquine in 2004. Studies were being completed in 2005. https://t.co/HUz0vgGKOY
RT @BartlettChrisJ: @zerohedge Early in the pandemic and again later I linked this 2005 study on the original SARS coronavirus outbreak sho…
This is going to add to the growing anger over suppression of Hydroxychloroquine for Sars-Covid while Fauci played pimp for the WEF and their kill-shot. This publication is dated in 2005 and revealed HCQ was effective as treatment. Many deaths since 04.
@shannonsinsc Oh you’re special https://t.co/XAHmbbz1kZ https://t.co/PewXCIyVJe https://t.co/hxqDuvGZlY https://t.co/RRncSFC23p https://t.co/gIytN0mhRj Here’s some research proving you wrong sonny Jim! Argue with factual data.
RT @Wiep13396680: Draadje van De Nachtzuster(s)💥 👩💻#NieuwsInPerspectief @Wiep13396680 @LidwienNews @rinsjan @J41963735 @Observeerder @Hel…
RT @SteredL: @MichaelVllt @JuliaCerisi @chris_perronne @PascalPraud @raoult_didier et effectivement le Pr Raoult avait raison l'hydroxychl…
When the scamdemic first came out, this was really easy to find yet nobody seemed to care as I was not a doctor nor scientist (still neither). Worth revisiting! Oh, who was in-charge of this journal? https://t.co/qJq15zj8KB
RT @Wiep13396680: Draadje van De Nachtzuster(s)💥 👩💻#NieuwsInPerspectief @Wiep13396680 @LidwienNews @rinsjan @J41963735 @Observeerder @Hel…
@D64806646 @Rene_Recicles @josevalAlbuque1 @ManfroiRenato Tu é muito burro mano... Já tem estudos desdd 2005 sobre a cloroquina vs coronavirus... Não sei se tu sabe mas esse de 2019 não o primeiro, já tiveram outros no passado. Médicos que já sabiam de
RT @GFWOE: @JohnSteiner32 @AmericanVictory @CraigRozniecki It did 20 years ago, according to Fauci. https://t.co/bJTlelfokQ
@zerohedge @wear_mind #HCQ SINCE 1638!!!!🤓 HCQ+ZYNC+AZT KILLS COVID! #ZelenkoProtocol $20/5Days Fauci/NIH KNEW in 2005 that HCQ was/is the CURE for COVID! NO VAX, NO MASK, NO LOCKDOWNS NEEDED! Fauci DESTROYED MILLIONS OF LIVES!!🤬 PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE as of
@JINKOUZOUKA_jp #HCQ SINCE 1638!!!!🤓 HCQ+ZYNC+AZT KILLS COVID! #ZelenkoProtocol $20/5Days Fauci/NIH KNEW in 2005 that HCQ was/is the CURE for COVID! NO VAX, NO MASK, NO LOCKDOWNS NEEDED! Fauci DESTROYED MILLIONS OF LIVES!!🤬 PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE as of 2005
@You3_JP #HCQ SINCE 1638!!!!🤓 HCQ+ZYNC+AZT KILLS COVID! #ZelenkoProtocol $20/5Days Fauci/NIH KNEW in 2005 that HCQ was/is the CURE for COVID! NO VAX, NO MASK, NO LOCKDOWNS NEEDED! Fauci DESTROYED MILLIONS OF LIVES!!🤬 PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE as of 2005 ON NIH
@ShortShort_News @wear_mind #HCQ SINCE 1638!!!!🤓 HCQ+ZYNC+AZT KILLS COVID! #ZelenkoProtocol $20/5Days Fauci/NIH KNEW in 2005 that HCQ was/is the CURE for COVID! NO VAX, NO MASK, NO LOCKDOWNS NEEDED! Fauci DESTROYED MILLIONS OF LIVES!!🤬 PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE
@marsou_mr @DrLoupis Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/1YrHxYGgTf Keep stocking though
@RonaldKuilder Fauci onderzocht het zelf in 2005 en kwam tot een opzienbarende conclusie. https://t.co/mxDKnWOnwK
RT @andthedaysgoby3: @CirclEdgeInc @zerohedge They actually sorted it out in 2005 https://t.co/ccUhleZvtE
RT @AbbeyMaeCook88: 👓#Fauciknew about HCQ in 2005. 👓 Straight up... So basically nobody needed to die. #FauciEmails #FauciGate #FauciLied…
RT @AbbeyMaeCook88: 👓#Fauciknew about HCQ in 2005. 👓 Straight up... So basically nobody needed to die. #FauciEmails #FauciGate #FauciLied…
@Lorenzo7127 And then they forgot to update their page for 3 years? Yeah, doubt it. It worked well in 2002, however, when liberals were still normal people. https://t.co/bJTleleQvi
@MrEncouragement @zerohedge Here you go 🤡 right off of Faucis website…fucking idiot https://t.co/aP7xXuQctA
. #PutThatInYourPipe @JesseKellyDC @SteveDeaceShow @SaraGonzalesTX @JeffyJFR @_drewquez @dbongino @Timcast @ShannonJoyRadio @tracybeanz For all who lost loved ones, know THEY KNEW in 2005 https://t.co/JH5OFIlwNu https://t.co/BTybcbIwWI
@elonmusk #HCQ SINCE 1638!!!!🤓 HCQ+ZYNC+AZT KILLS COVID! #ZelenkoProtocol $20/5Days Fauci/NIH KNEW in 2005 that HCQ was/is the CURE for COVID! NO VAX, NO MASK, NO LOCKDOWNS NEEDED! Fauci DESTROYED MILLIONS OF LIVES!!🤬 PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE as of 2005 ON NIH
@JohnSteiner32 @AmericanVictory @CraigRozniecki It did 20 years ago, according to Fauci. https://t.co/bJTlelfokQ
@Patrici30423853 @CraigRozniecki @ReNaeRAD @erincoyle22 Likely because of its antiviral properties. https://t.co/bJTlelfokQ
@Fynnderella1 HCQ is a base that is known to elevate the pH of acidic intracellular organelles, such as endosomes/lysosomes, essential for membrane fusion. Raising the pH is important because that inhibits the virus' ability to replicate through the RNAP
@RobdanPistov @Hexcalibur84481 @LanigiroDlyk @0xrubberducky @zerohedge Me, checks notes from 2005 Me, checks notes NIH study https://t.co/YH1KiOfy9B
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @brys_nathalie: @CKellyUAP @DowdEdward From the horse’s mouth, in 2005 https://t.co/uufINQRNzg
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
@john_bumblebee
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/8/05 - wederom een complot theorie die uit komt. Begrijpelijk, wetenschappers van @LUMC_Leiden @KU_Leuven zijn hier…
@Fynnderella1 @JoshWalkos I’m surprised this is still up https://t.co/UTPXOiOspv 2005 🤬🤬🤬