| Title |
The detection of CMV pp65 and IE1 in glioblastoma multiforme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11060-010-0383-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenneth G. Lucas, Lei Bao, Richard Bruggeman, Kimberly Dunham, Charles Specht |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,425,335
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#406
of 3,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,692
of 106,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,298 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.