↓ Skip to main content

A model of constitutional design and corruption

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Law and Economics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
A model of constitutional design and corruption
Published in
European Journal of Law and Economics, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10657-015-9486-z
Authors

Michael Mitsopoulos, Theodore Pelagidis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Lecturer 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Social Sciences 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2017.
All research outputs
#5,966,683
of 11,564,189 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Law and Economics
#54
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,913
of 264,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Law and Economics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,564,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them