RT @teppofelin: If anyone is interested in the weeds of the argument, we deal with them in this article on "surprise-hacking" (the theoreti…
RT @teppofelin: If anyone is interested in the weeds of the argument, we deal with them in this article on "surprise-hacking" (the theoreti…
RT @teppofelin: If anyone is interested in the weeds of the argument, we deal with them in this article on "surprise-hacking" (the theoreti…
RT @janzilinsky: Many great points in this paper. Placing an epistemic premium on “documenting human irrationality” seems as non-scientifi…
RT @janzilinsky: Many great points in this paper. Placing an epistemic premium on “documenting human irrationality” seems as non-scientifi…
“We define surprise-hacking as the planning, design and staging of experiments by which researchers seek to elicit counterintuitive, and typically, negative effects.”
RT @teppofelin: If anyone is interested in the weeds of the argument, we deal with them in this article on "surprise-hacking" (the theoreti…
Many great points in this paper. Placing an epistemic premium on “documenting human irrationality” seems as non-scientific as elevating models that rationalize all behavior. https://t.co/w0xmETs4K9
RT @teppofelin: If anyone is interested in the weeds of the argument, we deal with them in this article on "surprise-hacking" (the theoreti…
If anyone is interested in the weeds of the argument, we deal with them in this article on "surprise-hacking" (the theoretical counterpart of p-hacking) https://t.co/WEwaja5OgA as well as this Psych Bulletin & Review debate piece from a few years ago h
@JakeOrthwein and, of course, @teppofelin : 1) https://t.co/R0iLqDxamb later discussed in @NickJChater et al. 2018: https://t.co/Nqiyx7YMct 2) https://t.co/zFFGh5971q (Kauffman and Felin collaborated on multiple papers related to the frame problem as we
19/ If you enjoy bounded rationality, check this out. https://t.co/mRTEhCHN1p
RT @pierre_jacquel2: @CedricStolz C'est une distinction que je tire de cet article sur la rationalité, et effectivement ça vient bien de Ue…
@CedricStolz C'est une distinction que je tire de cet article sur la rationalité, et effectivement ça vient bien de Uexküll : https://t.co/tefiKwWKjS
The cognitive sciences, psychology, and economics are intimately linked in their interest in rationality. 📸 Keithia Grant https://t.co/WJZa24fr8d https://t.co/HW5QXox8GY
@Barbusceptique (Source : https://t.co/tefiKwF9sk )
RT @teppofelin: don't know if others are experiencing this: somehow more and more mistakes are ADDED (rather than corrected) once a paper h…
RT @teppofelin: don't know if others are experiencing this: somehow more and more mistakes are ADDED (rather than corrected) once a paper h…
This 🤷👇
don't know if others are experiencing this: somehow more and more mistakes are ADDED (rather than corrected) once a paper has been accepted by a journal - a few examples below (it should say "It is worth noting..." rather than "It is worth nothing...") 1/2
@ethnolectures Source : https://t.co/m3mOqh6diY (article compliqué mais super cool si des gens s'intéressent aux théories de la cognition !)
@Omar_MalinGenie Je lis cet article à un sujet proche https://t.co/Pr9xTGfcSa ça va t'intéresser et je vais forcer de ouf là-dessus dans les prochaines semaines et en faire un thread jcrois mdr
@khberglund @jeremymwolfe @Psychonomic_Soc Henrik - this PBR piece sets out some of the key fault lines: https://t.co/6llKZcakO5 though we don't directly get into the EMT/4E types of things
RT @eccemarco: Mind, rationality, and cognition: an interdisciplinary debate (co-written by the brilliant Gigerenzer, who always makes sens…
RT @eccemarco: Mind, rationality, and cognition: an interdisciplinary debate (co-written by the brilliant Gigerenzer, who always makes sens…
Mind, rationality, and cognition: an interdisciplinary debate (co-written by the brilliant Gigerenzer, who always makes sense) https://t.co/NuAjmKx0Ma
Now I have an idea of how important was the influence of Simon's pioneering work (1955), and later the work of Kahneman & Tversky on psychology and economics, in the analysis of equilibrium, efficent markets, etc @NickJChater @teppofelin https://t.co/0
RT @marcventresca: Read through this lively debate on 2017 paper by @teppofelin and colleagues. Important questions, structured responses,…
Adding to @ole_b_peters debate, timely https://t.co/zngIJRKIQQ
RT @timothy_dunn1: "Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate" https://t.co/PrBOtkwNjY
RT @timothy_dunn1: "Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate" https://t.co/SiMp9gX4YO
RT @timothy_dunn1: "Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate" https://t.co/SiMp9gX4YO
Read through this lively debate on 2017 paper by @teppofelin and colleagues. Important questions, structured responses, and a broad set of concerns about 'perception' in particular ways and equally about 'rationality in particular way @AndrewTStephen @Ste
Sobre la NATURALEZA de la MENTE, la PERCEPCIÓN y la RACIONALIDAD This article features an interdisciplinary debate and dialogue about the nature of mind, perception, and rationality... ;-) https://t.co/GApvncYSfN https://t.co/HpD8dP3uM1
RT @ynk_socpsy: review paper: debate in rationality (cognition and mind as well) https://t.co/ffrvN8yHJ9
review paper: debate in rationality (cognition and mind as well) https://t.co/ffrvN8yHJ9
and some responses: https://t.co/RPqW9M0TEC
RT @cogsci_soc: Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate by @NickJChater et al. in Psych Bull Rev. https://t.co/M9HHZV…
RT @cogsci_soc: Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate by @NickJChater et al. in Psych Bull Rev. https://t.co/M9HHZV…
RT @cogsci_soc: Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate by @NickJChater et al. in Psych Bull Rev. https://t.co/M9HHZV…
RT @cogsci_soc: Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate by @NickJChater et al. in Psych Bull Rev. https://t.co/M9HHZV…
RT @cogsci_soc: Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate by @NickJChater et al. in Psych Bull Rev. https://t.co/M9HHZV…
RT @cogsci_soc: Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate by @NickJChater et al. in Psych Bull Rev. https://t.co/M9HHZV…
RT @cogsci_soc: Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate by @NickJChater et al. in Psych Bull Rev. https://t.co/M9HHZV…
RT @cogsci_soc: Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate by @NickJChater et al. in Psych Bull Rev. https://t.co/M9HHZV…
RT @cogsci_soc: Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate by @NickJChater et al. in Psych Bull Rev. https://t.co/M9HHZV…
RT @cogsci_soc: Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate by @NickJChater et al. in Psych Bull Rev. https://t.co/M9HHZV…
RT @cogsci_soc: Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate by @NickJChater et al. in Psych Bull Rev. https://t.co/M9HHZV…
RT @cogsci_soc: Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate by @NickJChater et al. in Psych Bull Rev. https://t.co/M9HHZV…
Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate by @NickJChater et al. in Psych Bull Rev. https://t.co/M9HHZVNHwV
RT @OxfordSBS: Mind, rationality, and cognition - fascinating new article co-authored by our Prof @teppofelin: https://t.co/i4jBiX4kmS
RT @OxfordSBS: New article on mind, rationality, and cognition co-authored by our Prof @teppofelin. https://t.co/vUwqkGb1gD
New article on mind, rationality, and cognition co-authored by our Prof @teppofelin. https://t.co/vUwqkGb1gD
RT @OxfordSBS: Mind, rationality, and cognition - fascinating new article co-authored by our Prof @teppofelin: https://t.co/i4jBiX4kmS
Mind, rationality, and cognition - fascinating new article co-authored by our Prof @teppofelin: https://t.co/i4jBiX4kmS
RT @OxfordSBS: Mind, rationality, and cognition - fascinating new article co-authored by our Prof @teppofelin: https://t.co/AnKbCd0YIs
Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate | SpringerLink https://t.co/N6z0ykv6YH
RT @OxfordSBS: Mind, rationality, and cognition - fascinating new article co-authored by our Prof @teppofelin: https://t.co/AnKbCd0YIs
Mind, rationality, and cognition - fascinating new article co-authored by our Prof @teppofelin: https://t.co/AnKbCd0YIs
Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate https://t.co/D9qQd313UD
RT @koenfucius: Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate—super holiday reading, open access paper! https://t.co/DOBOTN…
RT @koenfucius: Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate—super holiday reading, open access paper! https://t.co/DOBOTN…
RT @koenfucius: Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate—super holiday reading, open access paper! https://t.co/DOBOTN…
"The brain cannot know the outside world with certainty; it can only make intelligent inferences." https://t.co/wVyHNcTkpj
Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate—super holiday reading, open access paper! https://t.co/DOBOTNdQbD https://t.co/Ny11Cy6EV9
Recommended reading https://t.co/hDCjs3BzpP
The first belief is on organism environment relationship, which is a twilight of uncertainty!! https://t.co/hvcQP4yXYH
RT @davdittrich: RT @teppofelin mind rationality & cognition - N. Chater G. Gigerenzer D. Noble B. Schwartz K. Stanovich P. Todd https://t.…
RT @davdittrich: RT @teppofelin mind rationality & cognition - N. Chater G. Gigerenzer D. Noble B. Schwartz K. Stanovich P. Todd https://t.…
RT @davdittrich: RT @teppofelin mind rationality & cognition - N. Chater G. Gigerenzer D. Noble B. Schwartz K. Stanovich P. Todd https://t.…
RT @teppofelin mind rationality & cognition - N. Chater G. Gigerenzer D. Noble B. Schwartz K. Stanovich P. Todd https://t.co/9f22PKcdfy https://t.co/Qvt2ATnYVJ
RT @CFCamerer: Looks juicy https://t.co/goaCPIVd9o
RT @CFCamerer: Looks juicy https://t.co/goaCPIVd9o
Looks juicy https://t.co/goaCPIVd9o