| Title |
What is chronic pain?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, September 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00489607 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John D. Loeser |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 28% |
| Psychology | 15 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2014.
All research outputs
#3,415,510
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
#51
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#919
of 16,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.