| Title |
Experimental system for measurement of radiologists’ performance by visual search task
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2193-1801-2-607 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eriko Maeda, Takeharu Yoshikawa, Ryoichi Nakashima, Kazufumi Kobayashi, Kazuhiko Yokosawa, Naoto Hayashi, Yoshitaka Masutani, Naoki Yoshioka, Masaaki Akahane, Kuni Ohtomo |
| Abstract |
Detective performance of radiologists for "obvious" targets should be evaluated by visual search task instead of ROC analysis, but visual task have not been applied to radiology studies. The aim of this study was to set up an environment that allows visual search task in radiology, to evaluate its feasibility, and to preliminarily investigate the effect of career on the performance. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 38% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 2 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,298,293
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#932
of 1,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,375
of 212,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#56
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.