| Title |
Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Tengö, Eduardo S. Brondizio, Thomas Elmqvist, Pernilla Malmer, Marja Spierenburg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 7 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 11% |
| Canada | 4 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
| Germany | 3 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 52% |
| Scientists | 19 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,500 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 7 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Ghana | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1465 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 266 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 252 | 17% |
| Researcher | 228 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 103 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 99 | 7% |
| Other | 226 | 15% |
| Unknown | 326 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 508 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 208 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 168 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 46 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 28 | 2% |
| Other | 137 | 9% |
| Unknown | 405 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#740,831
of 25,923,151 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#97
of 1,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,636
of 238,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,923,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.