↓ Skip to main content

Logic and Reasoning: do the facts matter?

Overview of attention for article published in Studia Logica, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 142)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

1 tweeter
1 Wikipedia page


29 Dimensions

Readers on

43 Mendeley
Logic and Reasoning: do the facts matter?
Published in
Studia Logica, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11225-008-9101-1

Johan van Benthem

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Luxembourg 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 37 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 35%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Lecturer 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 24 56%
Computer Science 4 9%
Psychology 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 7 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2014.
All research outputs
of 12,323,844 outputs
Outputs from Studia Logica
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 217,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studia Logica
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,323,844 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them