| Title |
California perennial crops in a changing climate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-011-0303-6 |
| Authors |
David B. Lobell, Christopher B. Field |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 33 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,728,295
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#1,092
of 5,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,676
of 239,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#14
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.