Recycled Concrete Aggregates: A Review
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, March 2013
Katrina McNeil, Thomas H.-K. Kang
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 661 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||96||15%|
|Student > Master||83||13%|
|Student > Bachelor||78||12%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||29||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,963,877 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
of 73 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 201,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,963,877 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them