| Title |
Dietary factors and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in Nebraska (United States)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, September 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01694756 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary H. Ward, Shelia Hoar Zahm, Dennis D. Weisenburger, Gloria Gridley, Kenneth P. Cantor, Robert C. Saal, Aaron Blair |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2006.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#950
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,538
of 22,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.