↓ Skip to main content

The effect of black tea on human cognitive performance in a cognitive test battery

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Phytoscience, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
The effect of black tea on human cognitive performance in a cognitive test battery
Published in
Clinical Phytoscience, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40816-017-0049-4
Authors

Ashfique Rizwan, Artyom Zinchenko, Ceyona Özdem, Md. Sohel Rana, Md. Mamun Al-Amin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 33%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Neuroscience 4 15%
Psychology 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 6 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,273,269
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#1
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,334
of 322,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them