796 followers
🧠
505 followers
One of Dr. Pugh's favorite papers published in Neuroethics is by Roger Crisp and Morten Kringlebach. Dr. Pugh says this paper is a "a perfect blend of philosophy and neuroscience delivering new insights into ethics." https://t.co/Dkfh3EJbFx
207 followers
More scientific view of higher and lower pleasures https://t.co/IZxutTU393
617 followers
RT @GreggDCaruso: Does J.S. Mill’s distinction between higher and lower pleasures fit with current neuroscientific evidence? https://t.co/I…
1,219 followers
RT @GreggDCaruso: Does J.S. Mill’s distinction between higher and lower pleasures fit with current neuroscientific evidence? https://t.co/I…
454 followers
RT @GreggDCaruso: Does J.S. Mill’s distinction between higher and lower pleasures fit with current neuroscientific evidence? https://t.co/I…
3,311 followers
RT @GreggDCaruso: Does J.S. Mill’s distinction between higher and lower pleasures fit with current neuroscientific evidence? https://t.co/I…
24,830 followers
Does J.S. Mill’s distinction between higher and lower pleasures fit with current neuroscientific evidence? https://t.co/I2qzYXrfiZ https://t.co/yLIVFTNIJg
801 followers
RT @HedoniaResearch: In our new paper, we argue that the distinction between higher and lower pleasures is not supported by neuroscience ht…
617 followers
Higher and Lower Pleasures Revisited: Evidence from Neuroscience https://t.co/UVuTUVy6eV
86 followers
RT @HedoniaResearch: In our new paper, we argue that the distinction between higher and lower pleasures is not supported by neuroscience ht…
1,413 followers
RT @HedoniaResearch: In our new paper, we argue that the distinction between higher and lower pleasures is not supported by neuroscience ht…
1,313 followers
In our new paper, we argue that the distinction between higher and lower pleasures is not supported by neuroscience https://t.co/fPjKRfzuQ6