↓ Skip to main content

Permeability and Burglary Risk: Are Cul-de-Sacs Safer?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Quantitative Criminology, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Permeability and Burglary Risk: Are Cul-de-Sacs Safer?
Published in
Journal of Quantitative Criminology, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10940-009-9084-8
Authors

Shane D. Johnson, Kate J. Bowers

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 6%
United States 3 3%
Belgium 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 85 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 30%
Student > Master 17 18%
Researcher 10 10%
Unspecified 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 22 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 43 45%
Unspecified 12 13%
Computer Science 7 7%
Design 7 7%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Other 21 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,613,541
of 12,197,957 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#73
of 348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,380
of 195,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,197,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.