| Title |
Technology innovation and diffusion in “less than ideal” climate policies: An assessment with the WITCH model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-011-0320-5 |
| Authors |
Enrica De Cian, Valentina Bosetti, Massimo Tavoni |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 14 | 19% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 12% |
| Engineering | 9 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,942,633
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,338
of 5,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,263
of 142,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#64
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.