↓ Skip to main content

Response of hydrological cycle to recent climate changes in the Tibetan Plateau

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Response of hydrological cycle to recent climate changes in the Tibetan Plateau
Published in
Climatic Change, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0099-4
Authors

Kun Yang, Baisheng Ye, Degang Zhou, Bingyi Wu, Thomas Foken, Jun Qin, Zhaoye Zhou

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 26%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 39 49%
Environmental Science 22 28%
Unspecified 6 8%
Engineering 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 6 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#776,351
of 8,154,593 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#855
of 4,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,187
of 161,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#10
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,154,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.