Title |
Horses and cows might teach us about human knees
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Science of Nature, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00114-014-1163-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C. Holland, F. Vollrath, H. S. Gill |
Abstract |
Our comparative study of the knees of horses and cows (paraphrased as highly evolved joggers and as domesticated couch-potatoes, respectively) demonstrates significant differences in the posterior sections of bovine and equine tibial cartilage, which are consistent with specialisation for gait. These insights were possible using a novel analytical measuring technique based on the shearing of small biopsy samples, called dynamic shear analysis. We assert that this technique could provide a powerful new tool to precisely quantify the pathology of osteoarthritis for the medical field. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Tunisia | 1 | 14% |
Italy | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 27% |
Student > Master | 6 | 23% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 7 | 27% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2014.
All research outputs
#6,965,069
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#729
of 2,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,835
of 227,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#17
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.