↓ Skip to main content


Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 blog
2 policy sources


326 Dimensions

Readers on

352 Mendeley
1 CiteULike
Published in
Climatic Change, January 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1010784727448

H. Middelkoop, K. Daamen, D. Gellens, W. Grabs, J. C. J. Kwadijk, H. Lang, B. W. A. H. Parmet, B. Schädler, J. Schulla, K. Wilke

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Netherlands 6 2%
Canada 4 1%
Italy 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Mongolia 1 <1%
Other 11 3%
Unknown 313 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 26%
Student > Master 84 24%
Researcher 51 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 7%
Unspecified 23 7%
Other 75 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 100 28%
Engineering 85 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 80 23%
Unspecified 33 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 6%
Other 32 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
of 12,329,095 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
of 4,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 266,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,329,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.