RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @tan123: "the world's leading climate scientist" 😂
RT @tan123: "the world's leading climate scientist" 😂 https://t.co/v6ZLZp7DSo
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
Michael Mann lied? On TV? And did so shamelessly? https://t.co/OgZjTgy5DB
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @tan123: "the world's leading climate scientist" 😂
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
This world's leading climate "scientist" bears perhaps the most responsibility for the loss of a cost-effective market driven energy supply, the imposition of anti-democratic, authoritarian restrictions on freedom & purveying misinformation since magic
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
This is a good example of jargon and bureaucracy destroying public policy and public trust, one mayor and one farmer at a time.
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
RT @Harry_Stevens: I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expe…
I didn't know this! A "100-year-flood" means "a flood with 1% chance of happening in any given year", not "a flood expected to occur once every hundred years". Cumulative probability produces counterintuitive results, and the nomenclature makes this eve
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
"a home in a 100-year flood zone has a 26% chance of seeing *at least* one 100-year flood over a given 30 year period."
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
"the world's leading climate scientist" 😂
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leadi…
@JohnRHornbuckle @RogerPielkeJr He did post it rigt after https://t.co/prONv7XTwR
Corollary is there is 37% chance that 100-year flood will NOT be observed in a given century, meaning we need ~200 years of accurate flood data to determine what 100-year flood is. Land usage (pavement) means bigger floods from less rainfall, focused runof
The "N-year event" is often confusing among non-experts, understandably so, but there is no excuse for the world's leading climate scientist to make this basic error on national TV Below from Pielke 1999: https://t.co/7jI5praYSe https://t.co/c8wuXpSHkn
RT @RogerPielkeJr: An oldie but a goodie Pielke, R. A. (1999). Nine fallacies of floods. Climatic Change, 42(2), 413-438. https://t.co/7xC…
@adambriggle See fallacy #1 here focused on misinterpretations of the N-year flood: https://t.co/7jI5prs1Ue Let me know if still unclear👍
RT @RogerPielkeJr: An oldie but a goodie Pielke, R. A. (1999). Nine fallacies of floods. Climatic Change, 42(2), 413-438. https://t.co/7xC…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: An oldie but a goodie Pielke, R. A. (1999). Nine fallacies of floods. Climatic Change, 42(2), 413-438. https://t.co/7xC…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: An oldie but a goodie Pielke, R. A. (1999). Nine fallacies of floods. Climatic Change, 42(2), 413-438. https://t.co/7xC…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: An oldie but a goodie Pielke, R. A. (1999). Nine fallacies of floods. Climatic Change, 42(2), 413-438. https://t.co/7xC…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: An oldie but a goodie Pielke, R. A. (1999). Nine fallacies of floods. Climatic Change, 42(2), 413-438. https://t.co/7xC…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: An oldie but a goodie Pielke, R. A. (1999). Nine fallacies of floods. Climatic Change, 42(2), 413-438. https://t.co/7xC…
@Andy_Schlic Yep That’s the recommendation I made in 1999 👍 https://t.co/7xChjrOVsK
RT @RogerPielkeJr: An oldie but a goodie Pielke, R. A. (1999). Nine fallacies of floods. Climatic Change, 42(2), 413-438. https://t.co/7xC…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: An oldie but a goodie Pielke, R. A. (1999). Nine fallacies of floods. Climatic Change, 42(2), 413-438. https://t.co/7xC…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: An oldie but a goodie Pielke, R. A. (1999). Nine fallacies of floods. Climatic Change, 42(2), 413-438. https://t.co/7xC…
An oldie but a goodie Pielke, R. A. (1999). Nine fallacies of floods. Climatic Change, 42(2), 413-438. https://t.co/7xChjrwMeC
@mjasandoval See Fallacy #1 here https://t.co/7xChjrwMeC