RT @Peters_Glen: @antunes_morgado @HarrisBerton Yes, fair point(s). I happen to fall on the side that CCS is overused in scenarios, & there…
@antunes_morgado @HarrisBerton Yes, fair point(s). I happen to fall on the side that CCS is overused in scenarios, & there is little effort to resolve / understand that (IMHO). Yes, that overshadows saying CCS is 'needed', but such is my conscience! T
@HMcJeon3y4 I'd like to see a focus on why models behave the way they do. E.g. this point by Glen https://t.co/57mlTyODb5. Maybe modellers understand though! But also see https://t.co/M4RjoKm9qk
@vassican @mammuthus @james_glynn Thanks. Just what I was after (& sort of what I expected). It seems to resonate very well with the paper I mentioned on CCS. https://t.co/ygVEdlg1Ds It gets to the root of the problem, it seems really hard to figure o
@vassican @mammuthus Or are you making a different point, you are talking about cross model? Similar conclusion here for CCS https://t.co/ygVEdlg1Ds But *within* one model, the deployment of BECCS might be relatively insensitive to costs? So is this about
RT @Peters_Glen: @LecturerSam This paper might give some of that info: https://t.co/ygVEdlg1Ds
@LecturerSam This paper might give some of that info: https://t.co/ygVEdlg1Ds
@noahqk "The strong variations of CCS deployment projection rates could not be related to the reported differences in the assumptions of the models by means of a cross-model comparison in this sample." https://t.co/ygVEdlg1Ds As my favourite example...
@Sustainable2050 "The strong variations of CCS deployment projection rates could not be related to the reported differences in the assumptions of the models by means of a cross-model comparison in this sample." It seems no one knows why the models use so
@Peters_Glen I assume you've seen this paper? I enjoyed the final line - i.e. we aren't really sure what is going on. I wonder if there have been any follow up studies? I'm not aware of any https://t.co/M4RjoKm9qk
@DrPaulBehrens @KevinClimate @katedooley0 See this paper on CCS, last sentence in abstract and discussion. https://t.co/ygVEdlg1Ds
@DrSimEvans @AukeHoekstra @MarkusWrake @IEA This CCS example is a nice one, using inputs & outputs does not reveal why different models get different outputs... https://t.co/ygVEdlg1Ds
RT @Peters_Glen: @mammuthus @KevinClimate @joaoestrangeiro @KenCaldeira But, data is just one aspect. More of an issue, even if there is a…
RT @Peters_Glen: @mammuthus @KevinClimate @joaoestrangeiro @KenCaldeira But, data is just one aspect. More of an issue, even if there is a…
@mammuthus @KevinClimate @joaoestrangeiro @KenCaldeira But, data is just one aspect. More of an issue, even if there is a well documented model, it does not mean that it is possible to understand. Particularly in complex optimisation models, such as most I
@mammuthus @stevebloom55 @RBrulle I think there has been far too little research on why CCS is high in models. Last sentence is key: https://t.co/ygVEdlg1Ds
@jgkoomey @EdgarHertwich @CarlsonEngineer @andersarvesen Ok, here 8/12 IAMs have early retirements https://t.co/ygVEdlg1Ds (paper is also an interesting/entertaining read if you are into CCS) https://t.co/8mH6qtyifO
@Sustainable2050 @nelderini @TheEnergyCraig I still have to read the detailed paper on CCS. Here if you want it http://t.co/XhXNrWmlDx
"Uncertainty in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) deployment projections: a cross-model comparison exercise" http://t.co/cuKx2sntJk $
new from IPCC_WGIII author Detlef van Vuuren, uncertainty in CCS deployment projections, Koelbl et al. Clim Chg. http://t.co/6Ad5fkaRIk