↓ Skip to main content

FDM simulation of earthquakes off western Kyushu, Japan, using a land–ocean unified 3D structure model

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
FDM simulation of earthquakes off western Kyushu, Japan, using a land–ocean unified 3D structure model
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40623-017-0672-9
Authors

Taro Okamoto, Hiroshi Takenaka, Takeshi Nakamura, Tatsuhiko Hara

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Other 2 15%
Professor 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 54%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Materials Science 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#1,311
of 1,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,741
of 326,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#15
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.