Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings

RT @Freakoutery: This is fascinating. Smarter liberals conform more with "experts," while smarter conservatives question "experts" more.

RT @Freakoutery: This is fascinating. Smarter liberals conform more with "experts," while smarter conservatives question "experts" more.

RT @Freakoutery: This is fascinating. Smarter liberals conform more with "experts," while smarter conservatives question "experts" more.

RT @Freakoutery: This is fascinating. Smarter liberals conform more with "experts," while smarter conservatives question "experts" more.

RT @Freakoutery: This is fascinating. Smarter liberals conform more with "experts," while smarter conservatives question "experts" more.

RT @Freakoutery: This is fascinating. Smarter liberals conform more with "experts," while smarter conservatives question "experts" more.

RT @Freakoutery: This is fascinating. Smarter liberals conform more with "experts," while smarter conservatives question "experts" more.

RT @Freakoutery: This is fascinating. Smarter liberals conform more with "experts," while smarter conservatives question "experts" more.

RT @Freakoutery: This is fascinating. Smarter liberals conform more with "experts," while smarter conservatives question "experts" more.

This is fascinating. Smarter liberals conform more with "experts," while smarter conservatives question "experts" more.

@jonatanpallesen @ggreenwald https://t.co/9vAyrLPDk9 https://t.co/pZ1OenLIzN

RT @briandavidearp: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | SpringerLink ht…

RT @briandavidearp: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | SpringerLink ht…

RT @briandavidearp: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | SpringerLink ht…

RT @briandavidearp: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | SpringerLink ht…

Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | SpringerLink https://t.co/E3lV1wtOWI

I also recommend this excellent paper by Neil Levy on denialism https://t.co/2OneKWPwnr

@CathrynTownsend Indeed. I am interested in how people can go into such rabbit holes and not see that they're being deceived by cynical folks. There is some literature e.g., https://t.co/p0BH6UGWbO Also my paper e.g., https://t.co/mE9HuNZtcc But it doesn'

A nice example of the important phenomenon where an issue becoming a matter of political affiliation makes for an epistemically polluted environment and drives misinformation. Here is the paper which taught me this concept: https://t.co/o1AZ0rBGwN

@veritasium Neil Levy : Due Deference to Denialism: https://t.co/0IBIV5Oqpq

RT @danwilliamsphil: Brilliant article by Neil Levy. "We rely on cues of benevolence and competence to distinguish reliable from unreliable…

RT @danwilliamsphil: Brilliant article by Neil Levy. "We rely on cues of benevolence and competence to distinguish reliable from unreliable…

RT @danwilliamsphil: Brilliant article by Neil Levy. "We rely on cues of benevolence and competence to distinguish reliable from unreliable…

RT @danwilliamsphil: Brilliant article by Neil Levy. "We rely on cues of benevolence and competence to distinguish reliable from unreliable…

RT @danwilliamsphil: Brilliant article by Neil Levy. "We rely on cues of benevolence and competence to distinguish reliable from unreliable…

This sounds like an excellent addition to our reading group on #delusion, #belief and #conspiracies starting this term #PhilMHRG @Ema_SB @del_by_ex @kmurphyhollies @annaichino

Brilliant article by Neil Levy. "We rely on cues of benevolence and competence to distinguish reliable from unreliable testifiers, but when debates become deeply politicized, asserting a claim may itself constitute signalling lack of reliability." https://

RT briandavidearp: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings https://t.co/MphGkaWYa5 https://t.co/vjpGDsbkPM

RT @iVivekMisra: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings https://t.co/KCBBr7p…

Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings https://t.co/KCBBr7pk3b

RT @briandavidearp: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings https://t.co/E3lV…

Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings https://t.co/E3lV1wtOWI https://t.co/Orh136S71h

https://t.co/Y78etRHG68

PapersOfTheDay https://t.co/AtSoOzzhPm "Scientific consensus and expert testimony in courts: Lessons from the Bendectin litigation" https://t.co/MoWB0l5MCz https://t.co/V5xDQYtvkI "Response by Cook to “Beyond Counting Climate Consensus”" https://t.co/19

@suonpaa @eevuheikura @kirkko_evl @PiispaJari Tästäkin aiheesta on muuten paljon kiinnostavaa tutkimusta ja lisää tulossa, mm. https://t.co/9hrUMuAU1D sekä https://t.co/hF2NydSekh . On vaikea tiivistää tuloksia twitterissä, mutta ehkä tulevassa artikkeliss

RT @AtomsksSanakan: @EuphoricEuler PapersOfTheDay "Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scien…

@EuphoricEuler PapersOfTheDay "Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings" https://t.co/hvfOyFn0Hy "Divergent perspectives on expert disagreement: Preliminary evidence from climate science, clima

RT @Helenreflects: Neil Levy explains in Due deference to denialism why increasingly numbers of people believe in crackpot denialist theori…

RT @Helenreflects: Neil Levy explains in Due deference to denialism why increasingly numbers of people believe in crackpot denialist theori…

Neil Levy explains in Due deference to denialism why increasingly numbers of people believe in crackpot denialist theories such as climate change denial here https://t.co/p0BH6UpkNe 14/

@AdamBaldwin @SarahKSilverman Actually, denialism IS scientific terminology, Adam. HIV/AIDS denialists caused the deaths of tens of thousands of people in South Africa, for example. https://t.co/rrNxi8oaox

@GreenFutureBlog Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s... https://t.co/EXhkId0tAm via springer https://t.co/1yB66DlkMc

Interesting read on why some people reject scientific findings. https://t.co/TUIx3MZP0K #openaccess #sciencematters

Interesting new article from Neil Levy on epistemic authority https://t.co/hVVuQJfXKv

Climate change denial doesn't result from irrationality or ignorance, but adaptive epistemic traits https://t.co/LZ8jRwLEJ6

RT @StephCher1: I'm reading this on #springerlink https://t.co/Iwmp64nCau

I'm skeptical of some claims in this article. I'll get back to it after I can state my skepticism clearly. https://t.co/xP54RB90gv

RT @GreggDCaruso: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | By Neil Levy http…

RT @jenniferbmuller: recommended reading #science #communication #scicomm #climate #evolution #policy https://t.co/CYGNUr8pJM

recommended reading #science #communication #scicomm #climate #evolution #policy https://t.co/CYGNUr8pJM

Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings https://t.co/sZrZ37qSOj

RT @cult_cognition: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | SpringerLink ht…

Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings https://t.co/JW1bVnEoRO via @Paperity

RT @HelenDeCruz: Why do conservatives not believe in climate change? A cognitive theory here. https://t.co/p0BH6UGWbO

Theory rejects the lack of epistemic humility as an explanation. https://t.co/FwsqfUX0ZD

Why do conservatives not believe in climate change? A cognitive theory here. https://t.co/p0BH6UGWbO

Source: https://t.co/cbFylOUUW4

Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings https://t.co/1GgIstx3ZZ

Perhaps climate deniers avoid deference to scientists because experts lack benevolence #kindness #compassion https://t.co/elBwWBBGMn

RT @cult_cognition: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | SpringerLink ht…

Dissect confirmation-bias. Not clear what communication strategy this perspective points towards. https://t.co/qlm5CJGZCq

gotta read this. https://t.co/QMFCQbVotk

RT @john_s_wilkins: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings https://t.co/xtnJ…

RT @john_s_wilkins: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings https://t.co/xtnJ…

Explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings https://t.co/Pbv6NfNr6A via @GreggDCaruso

RT @GreggDCaruso: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | By Neil Levy http…

Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings https://t.co/xtnJGWvwXC

RT @GreggDCaruso: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | By Neil Levy http…

RT @GreggDCaruso: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | By Neil Levy http…

RT @GreggDCaruso: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | By Neil Levy http…

I'm reading this on #springerlink https://t.co/Iwmp64nCau

RT @GreggDCaruso: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | By Neil Levy http…

Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings https://t.co/RFQixJlcUX (open access)

RT @cult_cognition: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | SpringerLink ht…

RT @GreggDCaruso: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | By Neil Levy http…

RT @cult_cognition: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | SpringerLink ht…

RT @GreggDCaruso: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | By Neil Levy http…

For #socpsy Why people believe what they want to believe (surprise! It's not about being stupid or misinformed): https://t.co/gcx41iNcZL

RT @cult_cognition: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | SpringerLink ht…

RT @cult_cognition: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | SpringerLink ht…

RT @GreggDCaruso: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | By Neil Levy http…

RT @GreggDCaruso: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | By Neil Levy http…

RT @cult_cognition: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | SpringerLink ht…

Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | By Neil Levy https://t.co/QyGmZGLjfK

RT @cult_cognition: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | SpringerLink ht…

RT @cult_cognition: Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | SpringerLink ht…

Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings | SpringerLink https://t.co/up6paW72L6