↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D deficiency and risk of acute lung injury in severe sepsis and severe trauma: a case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D deficiency and risk of acute lung injury in severe sepsis and severe trauma: a case-control study
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/2110-5820-4-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Barnett, Zhiguo Zhao, Tatsuki Koyama, David R Janz, Chen-Yu Wang, Addison K May, Gordon R Bernard, Lorraine B Ware

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) levels at the onset of critical illness and the development of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) in patients with sepsis or trauma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 16 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2014.
All research outputs
#13,403,925
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#701
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,459
of 223,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.