4,227 followers
FWIW, an academic paper by @ykrupnikov and @nmbauer found that female candidates are more likely to be punished for going negative when it's not provoked, especially by members of their opposing party. https://t.co/tj5spyIazQ
3,983 followers
RT @WendyGSmooth: Yes @ErinCassese so true-we know the rules are not the same for women candidates. Snark backfires for women. Women ignori…
13,669 followers
RT @WendyGSmooth: Yes @ErinCassese so true-we know the rules are not the same for women candidates. Snark backfires for women. Women ignori…
3,381 followers
RT @WendyGSmooth: Yes @ErinCassese so true-we know the rules are not the same for women candidates. Snark backfires for women. Women ignori…
976 followers
Yes @ErinCassese so true-we know the rules are not the same for women candidates. Snark backfires for women. Women ignoring the time rules is also a punishable offense #GenderLens2020 #DemDebate @CAWP_RU
4,484 followers
RT @ErinCassese: Interested to see how these shots at Trump land with voters. Research shows voters can sometimes penalize women for instig…
13,669 followers
3,381 followers
Interested to see how these shots at Trump land with voters. Research shows voters can sometimes penalize women for instigating negativity, but will that apply in this context? See work from @nicholebauer & @YannaKrupnikov https://t.co/PgIMzBRb8H #Wome
7,219 followers
In an exp, @ykrupnikov and Bauer find out-partisan female cands are disproportionately punished for going negative http://t.co/hcVXxS9ZXS
19,262 followers
In an exp, @ykrupnikov and Bauer find out-partisan female cands are disproportionately punished for going negative http://t.co/hcVXxS9ZXS