↓ Skip to main content

Fat embolism syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Fat embolism syndrome
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4868-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anselmo Caricato, Giovanni Russo, Daniele Guerino Biasucci, Maria Giuseppina Annetta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 58%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,957,866
of 24,451,685 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,175
of 5,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,413
of 319,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#44
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,451,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.