| Title |
Book review for “Orthognathic Surgery: Principles, Planning and Practice”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40902-017-0119-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seong-Gon Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 50 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#55
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,487
of 328,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them